Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Permit Number - T04CM04586
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/03/2004 | Gerry Koziol | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/05/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | November 7, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The residential site/building plans have been reviewed but cannot be approved at this time. The following criteria must be addressed. a. LUC section 3.5.7.1.H requires that for all single family dwellings in the R-1 zone with five (5) or more bedrooms, and for all lots containing two (2) or more single family dwellings, with the second dwelling having more than one bedroom, all parking and maneuvering must be located on-site, either in a side or rear perimeter yard. The vehicular use area must be improved, which includes surfacing, striping, and provision of barriers, in conformance with Development Standard 3-05.0. Parking spaces may not be located in a vehicular use area in any front street perimeter yard. This site must be developed to comply with the criteria as specified. b. Also per an interpretation by the Zoning Administrator access will not be allowed through an alley. c. The parking space in front of the site does not meet the criteria as specified in LUC section 3.5.7.1.H. d. The vehicular use area in the rear yard must be paved and must meet the development standards 3-05 design criteria. e.Submit a copy of the last approved site plan that demonstrates that the exisitng covered patio along the east side of the property has been permitted. f. Several Board of Adjustment variances will be required in order to allow the proposed development as depicted on the site plan. |
| 11/16/2004 | David Witt | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T04CM04586 11/19/04 1115 E. HELEN ST. PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2003 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE. 2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. SITE PLAN: 1. PLEASE SPECIFY THE WATER METER SIZE. FLOOR PLANS: 1. BRACED WALL HDWE. / 2.0 ; HOLD DOWNS FOR TWO STORY ALTERNATE BRACED WALL PANELS ARE REQUIRED TO REQUIRED TO BE RATED AT 3000# MINIMUM (R602.10.6 ITEM 2). 2.BRACED WALL HDWE. / 2.0 ; THE PAHD42, WHEN ON THE END STUD ON AN OUTSIDE CORNER, IS LESS THAN 1800# (SEE SIMPSON AND R602.10.6 ITEM 1). DID YOU MEAN HPAHD22? 3. BRACED WALL PANEL 3 / 2.0 ; THE ALTERNATE BRACED WALLS OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF A TWO STORY BUILDING REQUIRE SHEATHING ON BOTH SIDES. ALSO, PLEASE CHECK THE EDGE NAILING OF THE PANELS AND THE ANCHOR BOLT LOCATION FOR THIS PANEL. SEE R602.10.6 ITEM 2 . 4. BRACED WALL 1 AND 2 / 2.0 ; 6d APPEAR INADEQUATE FOR THE BWPs SHEATHING. SEE R602.10.6 ITEM 1 . 5. FIRST FLOOR PLAN / 2.0 ; AFTER THE ADDITION, THE "OPEN AREA" ADJACENT THE HALL WILL HAVE NO EXTERIOR WINDOW FOR VENTILATION. HOW WILL THIS ROOM BE VENTILATED? PLEASE NAME THIS ROOM ACCORDING TO IT'S INTENDED USE. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. HEADER SCHEDULE / 5.0 ; SOME OF THE HEADERS ON THIS CHART FAIL. THE HEADERS ARE ALREADY SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE, EITHER CORRECT THE SCHEDULE OR DELETE IT. SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. 2 / 3 ; HOW WILL THE PLATE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STRINGERS BE CONNECTED TO THE FLOOR? 2. F / 3 ; SHOULD THE FOOTINGS THAT ARE LABELED AS 1 / 5.0 AND 2 / 5.0 BE LABELED AS 1 / 4.0 AND2 / 4.0 ? 3. 6 / 4.0 ; THE USE OF EPOXY REQUIRES A SPECIAL INSPECTION BY AN APPROVED ENGINEER. THE APPROVAL FORMS ARE AVAILABLE AT OUR PERMIT COUNTER. THE USE OF GROUT IN LIEU OF THE EPOXY WOULD AVOID THE SPECIAL INSPECTION. 4. D / 5.0 ; 3" IS THE MINIMUM DIMENSION FOR SCUPPER OPENINGS, SEE U.P.C. TABLE D-2. THE OPENING IS LIMITED TOBEING LESS THAN 4", SEE I.R.C. R312.2. HOW WILL THE WATER BE DIRECTED TO THE SCUPPER? 5. 1 / 5.0 ; HOW DOES THE GYP. BD. ON THE CEILING THAT'S FRAMED AT 24" O.C. COMPLY WITH TABLE R702.3.5 FOOTNOTE D? 6. 1 , 2 / 5.0 ; PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE FIRE BLOCKS AT THE CEILING LINES. SEE R602.8 . 7. 3 / 5.0 ; PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE 3-16d FACE NAILING THAT CONNECTS THE TWO JOISTS. SEE TABLE R602.3(1) . 8. 5 / 5.0 ; HU216TF DOESN'T FIT A 2 X 10. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. PLEASE JUSTIFY THE EXISTING ¾" WATER METER'S ABILITY TO SUPPLY THE EXISTING AND THE PROPOSED FIXTURE LOAD. IS IT ¾"? PROVIDE SIZE ON THE PLANS. MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. MECHANICAL / 7.0 ; HOW DOES THE SUPPLY AND RETURN COMPLY WITH M1403.1 ? IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110 |