Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM04534
Parcel: 13819045A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T04CM04534
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/13/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/15/2004 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The Pima Department of Environmental Quality must approve the design of the private sewer collection system prior to a review by Development Services of the City of Tucson.
2. Revise the size of the combined rain water leader exiting the building at L-1 to comply with the sizing shown in Table D-2 (1/8" Slope), UPC 1994.
3. Revise the size of the rain water leader beginning at L-12 to comply with the sizing shown in Table D-2 (1/8" Slope), UPC 1994.
4. Revise the sleeve for the underslab gas piping in room 109 to provide a vent to the outside. Reference Section 1211.3 (exception), UPC 1994, as modified by the State of Arizona.
5. Provide a riser diagram for the complete gas piping system, including the lengths of the pipe segments and the appliance loads. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
6. Revise the size of the gas pipe running between AC-4 and AC-5 (288 CFH @ 250 feet) to conform to the requirements of Table 12-3, UPC 1994.
7. Provide an accessible cleanout in the vertical portion of the foot vent for the island sink in rooms 109 and 110. Reference Section 909.0, UPC 1994.
8. Verify that the minimum required water pressure is 25 PSI (Eyewashes (P10) typically require 30 PSI). Show the location of the eyewash on the drawing and verify that the ½" CW line feeding P9 and P10 at the teacher's demonstration table is adequate. Reference Section 608.1, UPC 1994
9. Revise the water and waste fixture units for P6 and P9 to correspond to Tables 6-3 and 7-3, UPC 1994. Revise the water, waste, and vent pipe sizes as required.
10. Show the size, route, and termination of the temperature and pressure relief for the water heater. Reference Section 608.5, UPC 1994.
10/15/2004 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. An appeal to the building official is required prior to the use of ASHRAE 62N for determining the ventilation of a project.
2. Provide information regarding the types and quantities of chemicals to be used and stored in rooms 109 and 111.
3. Provide information to show how makeup air is being supplied to room 109. Reference Section 510.5.5, IMC 2000.
4. Provide the type, dimensions, and configuration of the fume hood for room 109. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
10/15/2004 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
10/20/2004 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied Building plans may not be approved until the site plan has been approved by all sections and the building plans have been approved by Building Review.
10/29/2004 CHRISTY FOREMAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS

DATE: 11-08-04
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM04534
PROJECT NAME: SAN MIGUEL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION / CLASSROOM BUILDING
PROJECT ADDRESS: 212 W. MEDINA, BLDG. 1
ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: KIM FERRANTI, ABA ARCHITECTS
PROJECT REVIEWER: CHRISTY FOREMAN



TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1) SHT. S201 BEAM BETWEEN COLUMN LINE 4 & 5, 6 & 7 @ COLUMN C CALLS OUT A 18X35 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ROOF FRAMING SHT 20 CALLS OUT A B2 = W21X50. PLEASE CLARIFY.
2) STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS MISSING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS NOT SHOWN BETWEEN COLUMN LINE 5 & 6 @ COLUMN LINE B. DRAWING S201 SHOWS A W14 X 22. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS MISSING. PLEASE CLARIFY.
3) CALL OUT MISSING ON STRUCTURAL SHT 20 FOR W10 X 12 SHOWN ON SHT. S201.
4) CLARIFY STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR W8X10 FRAMING BETWEEN COLUMN LINE C&D / 5&6.
5) CLARIFY / JUSTIFY CIRCUMFRANCE FRAMING ON STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS DRAWING SHT. 20.
6) LT2 NOTED ON STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS DRAWING SHT. 20. LOCATE LT2 ON SHT. S201. CLARIFY LOCATION ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.
7) CLARIFY F7 FOOTING CALCULATIONS.
8) F4 FOOTING ON SHT. S101 WHERE ARE CALULATIONS AND LOCATION ON SHT 28 OF STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS.
9) CLARIFY FOOTINGS ON CIRCUMFRANCE.
10) LOCATE / CLARIFY MP1 REINFORCEMENT ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS.
11) LOCATION OF C1 & C2 ON STRUCTURAL SHT. 28 COORDINATE LOCATIONS ON DRAWING S101 WITH COLUMN SCHEDULE ON SHT. S301.
12) J1 SHT. S401 & E15 / A101 DOES NOT MATCH MCJ & END WALL REINFORCEMENT ON STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHT. 43.
10/29/2004 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building plans may not be approved until the site plan has been approved by all sections and the building plans have been approved by Building Review. The stamped/approved Development Plan may be walked through for over-the-counter Site Plan approval.
11/05/2004 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. It appears that some Fixtures R are on 2-pole CBs (perimeter lights on 40, 42), whereas others (parking lot lights on 30,32) are on single-pole. Please clarify.
2. Panels A1 and B1 schedules indicate "Lugs Only". Since they are fed via feed-through lugs at Panels A and B, and since their conductor sizes are of ampacity 200A, they would be considered Tap Conductors per NEC 240.2. It appears that they violate 240.21 (A) because Panels A1 and B1 are rated 225 A. Suggest the addition of 200 A MCBs for these panels.
3. Equipment grounding conductors in the above feeders, sized per Table 250.122 for the 400A AF, should be of minimum size #3.
4. In Fault Current Note #4, please correct the NEC references from the 1999 to the 2002 version. For example "110.22" and "240.83 (c)" instead on "110-22" and "240-83 z(c).
5. Please identify the dedicated 120V circuit for the UPS indicated on the Partial Intercom System Riser Diagram on Sheet E601. Provide for grounding as a separately derived system (250.30) if applicable.
11/16/2004 Gerry Koziol WWM REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/17/2004 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/17/2004 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed