Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM04528
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/14/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Additional trees are required per LUC 3.7.2.3 Ord. No. 10016, §1, 8/2/04. Within a vehicular use area, 1 canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces. Every parking space shall be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree, as measured from the center of the tree trunk. 2. Verbena peruviana is considered a ground cover and will not be typically available in 5-gal containers. 20% of the 50% required landscape border coverage is to be 5-gallon size per DS 2-06.3.5.F. Calliandra californica would be an acceptable replacement for a portion of the Verbena to met landscape border requirements. 3. Refer to Gary Witwer RLA of TDOT concerning any removal of trees included in Sixth Ave. Paving Improvements Case # 1-96-41 page 10 of 53 Future improvements are not planned at this time. Revise or remove related comments if needed. 4. Show on the landscape plan irrigation design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 5. Included the correct address on the site plan per DS 2-02.2.1.A.3 6. Add note to landscape plan: All plants to be preserved-in-place including plants located on adjacent lots shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A |
| 10/15/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | All plants to be preserved-in-place including plants located on adjacent lots shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A |
| 11/01/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/02/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/03/2004 | Doug Williams | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The Hydrologic/Hydraulic report does not provide detailed modeling or discussion of the regulatory flows in the vicinity of this site. The report and site plan may be acceptable based on an assumption that the site IS affected by regulatory flow (in the 100-year floodplain), however, a floodplain use permit will be required in such case. The proposed site plan indicates the site will be elevated above existing grade, and as such, resubmittal of the site plan must be accompanied by a floodplain use permit application and an encroachment analysis demonstrating this development will conform with floodway fringe development requirements (Tuc. Code - Section 26-5.2). Alternatives to an encroachment analysis include revising the site plan to clearly depict existing grades will be maintained upon development/paving of the site, or submittal of a more detailed drainage study containing split flow analyses, hydraulic modeling of existing culverts, streets and overland flows, etc., demonstrating the site is not affected by, or within the regulatory floodplain. Please refer to the City of Tucson's Standards Manual For Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (DS 10-02.0), Sections 2.1.2 and 2.3 for report content requirements. See redlines on plans for clarification of additional comments provided below: 2. Provide written approval from Environmental Services Dept. for the proposed curbside 90 gallon container and pickup, and depict a screened storage area onsite. 3. Revise the Paving and Grading notes to conform with Development Standard 11-01.0. 4. Clarify the western property line screening material to be constructed/utilized. 5. Provide City Field Book and Page for the project's basis of elevation. 6. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (earthwork). 7. Correct the "Bluestake" phone # provided in the paving and grading notes. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/05/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |