Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM04525
Parcel: 137050040

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04CM04525
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/12/2004 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire sprinklers required per 2003 IBC Sec. 903.2.1.2 (Tucson Amendments)
10/13/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit application for exception, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants per DS 2-15.2.0
10/13/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Interior Landscape Border is required for O3 zoned property to the south along site boundary per LUC 3.7.2.I. The minimum width of an interior landscape border is the lesser of ten (10) feet

2. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of interior landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4

3. An unpaved planter within the vehicle use area a minimum of (34) square feet in area and (4) feet in width excluding curbs must be provided for each canopy tree per DS 2-06.3.3.c

4. Submit application for exception, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants per DS 2-15.2.0
11/04/2004 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied a) Provide a detail for the access ramp/s. Refer to ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 405 for ramp specifications. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8)
b) How does a disabled person using the access aisle get to the accessible pedestrian sidewalk. Per Sec. 502.4 ICC/ANSI A-117.1-1998, access aisles shall have surface slopes not steeper than 1:48 and shall be the same level as the parking space they serve. Demonstrate graphically how this requirement is met.
11/04/2004 Daniel Castro ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two (2) parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. You may obtain a copy of the covenant online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf
or you may contact me at the number below. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2)

2. A total of 16 vehicle parking spaces are drawn on the site plan sheet C1. The vehicle parking calculation on sheet T1 states there is a total of 14 vehicle parking spaces provided. Correct the calculation as required. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4)

3. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 "Food Service", a total of 30 vehicle parking spaces are required for this project. 16 spaces are provided. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4)

4. a) Provide a detail for the access ramp/s. Refer to ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 405 for ramp specifications. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8)
b) How does a disabled person using the access aisle get to the accessible pedestrian sidewalk. Per Sec. 502.4 ICC/ANSI A-117.1-1998, access aisles shall have surface slopes not steeper than 1:48 and shall be the same level as the parking space they serve. Demonstrate graphically how this requirement is met.

5. Label and dimension existing and future right-of-way for Irvington Road. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19)

6. Sight visibility triangles may not be verified for compliance until the existing and future right-of-way has been provided. It does appear that a portion of the sign is located in an area that could be future-right-of-way. If so, a stamp will be added to the plan indicating that upon right-of-way widening, all improvements in the future right-of-way will be removed at no expense to the City of Tucson. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10)

7. A continuous sidewalk is required along the entire west side of the new and existing building. The sidewalk shall meet the requirements in D.S. 2-08. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12)

8. Provide a fully dimensioned detail of the existing sign and if applicable, provide a detail of proposed signs and outdoor lighting. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25)

9. The proposed use/s listed on sheet T1 shall be listed as follows: Principal Use: Food Service DD"30" subject to Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and 3.5.13.5. Secondary Use: Perishable Goods Manufacturing subject to Sec. 3.2.4, 2.5.4.4.B.1.c, and 3.5.5.2.

10. List the square footage allocated to the permitted secondary use (tortilla manufacturing) on the site plan. This information shall be listed as a calculation and shall include the total building square footage to verify compliance with 2.5.4.4.B.

11. If a Board of Adjustment variance is applied for and approved, please note the case number, date of approval, variance/s granted, and any conditions imposed on the sheet T1.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person.
11/05/2004 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1. Clearly label the future (ultimate) right-of-way width for Irvington road on the plan.
2. Revise the depiction of the solid waste enclosure. Clearly show that steel guard posts will be placed along the side walls of the enclosure in addition to the guard posts along the back wall. Clearly indicate that the posts will be positioned to allow ten feet of clear space.
3. Show that pedestrian ways will be kept flood free for all discharges up to a 10-year event. Show sidewalk scuppers or other means of directing roof drainage away from the sidewalks.