Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM04519
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/16/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire hydrants required. Submit approved COT Water Plan. |
| 08/25/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to include curbing or other suitable barrier at the perimeter of all vehicular use areas and where landscaping is susceptible to vehicle damage. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 2) Revise the plans to provide screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. All areas of the site except for the parking lot must be screened from adjacent streets with a 5' high screen. LUC 3.7.3 3) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B 4) Revise the plans to clarify compliance with LUC 3.7.2.7 (dust control) for all portions of the project that are not developed with improvements. 5) Revise the plans to indicate if the adjacent right-of way area between the property line and the street paving is to be altered. Provide dust control per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. Indicate where existing vegetation is to remain. A permit and native plant preservation plan is required for work in the public right-of-way. 6) Revise the plans to provide a 2' minimum seperation between the proposed 30" screen walls and the parking area access lanes (PAALS) 7) Identify the location of the water meter and the name of the water service provider on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.C 8) The permit application received lists 6455 S. Wilmot, however the plans received for Desert Oasis Vending list 6473 S. Wilmot as the address. Correct as necessary. 9) Revise the landscape plan to show plants required or preserved by the Native Plant Preservation Plan. 10) Revise the landscape and Native Plant Preservation Plans to correspond with the development proposed for this permit. The plans include areas beyond the scope of the site plan. Clarify any proposed phasing. DS 2-15.0., LUC 3.8 11) The site is located in a proposed Environmental Resource Overlay Zone. Where the owner of a lot or parcel affected by these regulations chooses to leave the one hundred (100) year floodplain undisturbed, the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) does not apply except that temporary fencing will be placed between the project site and the floodplain area as provided in Sec. 2.8.6.6.B; where permitted by the floodplain ordinance, development in this floodplain area is allowed as provided in Sec. 2.8.6.6. The landscape and native plant preservation plans require revision to match the site plan that indicates no floodplain development. The riparian habitat delineation on the landscape plan does not appear to correspond with the Critical and Sensitive Biological Communities Map. The delineation should include areas where Prosopis velutina exceed the density of surrounding areas. |
| 08/26/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | See landscape comments. |
| 08/26/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Mike Kreus-Reliable Permit Management 7630 N. Massingale Place Tucson, AZ 85741 (520) 370-7080 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T04CM04519 Trade Service 6380 E. Littletown Road (2nd review) TRANSMITTAL: August 26, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The project site is within the Airport Departure Corridor-2 (ADC-2) for Davis Monthan Airforce Base. Land Uses in the Commercial Services Use Group, such as the Trade Service use proposed are permitted in the I-2 zone only if a protected development right plan was approved by Mayor & Council specifically for such use prior to June 30, 2005. Provide a copy of the approved development right plan. LUC 2.8.5.8.3.b 2. Clarify the proposed use in the zoning information. The parking calculations are incorrect. If the proposed use is trade service and repair-major, vehicle parking is required at a ratio of 1 space per 1,000 square feet of gross LOT area. If the proposed principal use is trade service and repair-minor, vehicle parking is required at a ratio of 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. Revise calculations. The use of "vending service" is unclear. Is this a wholesaling use? Please specify what the principal proposed use is. Also state the existing use (vacant?) on the plan. LUC 3.3.3.4 DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 3. All lettering and dimensions shall be a minimum of twelve point (0.12") in size and clearly legible for microfilming/archiving purposes. Revise text in the location map, which is too small and light for photo reproduction, and any other text and dimensions (parking space, landscape buffer, sidewalk, PAAL, building and wheelstop curb dimensions, slope of handicap aisle, etc.) which do not meet the minimum size standard. 4. The site is within the recently adopted Airport Environ's Zone's ADC-2 zone. Add a note so stating to the AEZ note and label the ADC-2 boundary on the plan drawing. Add the following notes to the AEZ note: 1) No more than twenty (20) employees per acre of the site area at any time may be accommodated by intention, design, or in fact. 2) The minimum project site is five (5) acres. 3) The maximum FAR is 0.30 of the project site area. LUC 2.8.5.8.B If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/26/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Stephan Robinson DATE: September 13, 2005 Architect 8115. E. Cloud Road Tucson, Arizona 85750 SUBJECT: Wilmot and Littletown, 6455 S. Wilmot Road Site plan T05CM04519 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 07 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. The project shows a "Development line" between the two modulars, is this a phase line or perhaps it may be a future property line. In any case, the properties must function as one when related to drainage. Address as required. 3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 5. List area of disturbance of the development and any off-site work. 6. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 7. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Wilmot Road is listed as an arterial street per the Major Street and Routes map. 8. Sidewalks will be required on both frontages along with the wheelchair ramp at the corner of Wilmot Rd and Littletown Rd per D.S. 3-01.3.3. 9. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 10. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 11. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 12. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 13. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 14. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 15. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Also intersection widening will be required for Wilmot Road per the Major Street and Routes map. 16. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. 17. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 18. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 19. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 20. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 21. Show Development plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 22. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. A 10'x10' clear inside space is also required. 23. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 24. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 25. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 26. List the consulting engineer on the plans with the pertinent information. 27. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 28. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". The SWPPP will not be reviewed prior to the submittal of the grading plans. 29. On sheet sd1, the flow is being depicted to "go around" the detention basin. Revise or explain as required. 30. The site plan details shall match the Drainage Report. 31. Is the Ret./Det. basin located off-site? Show all property lines. 32. Show all drainage structures and drainage channels on the Site plan. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The project shows a "Development line" between the two modulars, is this a phase line or perhaps it may be a future property line. In any case, the properties must function as one when related to drainage. Address as required. 3. All basins must be graded to drain. Revise as required. 4. Per the DR, percolation results are required prior to the issuance of the grading permit. 5. There is only a small portion of the Det./Ret basin is less than 2.0' in depth and because the majority of the basin is well over the 2.0' with 3:1 sides slopes, security barriers will be required per Chap. IV of the Stormwater Det./Ret. manual. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6455 S. Wilmot Rd Site |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/13/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |