Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM04349
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/13/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/13/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope. Reference Section 101.3, International Energy Conservation Code 2000. 2. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference Section 401, IMC 2000. 3. Clarify how the air pressurization of the building complies with Section 403.1, IMC 2000. 4. Clarify how the total of the exhaust flows for the main building, as shown in the exhaust fan schedule, is only 1585 CFM but the maximum exhaust flow shown in the air pressurization summary is 3135 CFM. 5. Ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires 75 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet or urinal. Reference Table 403.3, IMC 2000. 6. Provide a combination fire/smoke damper for the oxygen room (127). Reference Section 3006.2.1, IFC 2003. 7. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference Section 307.2, IMC 2000 and Section 807.2, UPC 1994. 8. Show the size, routing, and termination of the drain from the evaporative cooler. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. |
| 01/14/2005 | Robert Sherry | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 1994 Uniform Plumbing Code with Arizona State Amendments. 2. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference Section 610.4, UPC 1994. 3. Include all fixtures and the water requirements of the HVAC equipment when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994. 4. Complete the water and waste riser diagrams by showing the pipe sizes. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 5. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes over 5 feet in length and for all sinks. Reference Section 707.4, UPC 1994. 6. Modify trap arm lengths (e.g. FD-1 in room 125) to conform to Table 10-1, UPC 1994 with AZ State amendments. 7. Clarify the reason for the traps on the four trench drains that empty directly into the sump pits (P10). One of the sump pits is mislabeled as P11 on sheet P100. 8. Size the natural gas pipe using Table 12-3, UPC or provide calculations demonstrating conformance to Section 1217.3, UPC 1994. 9. Indicate the location referenced by keynote 10 on sheet P102. 10. Complete keynote 12 on sheet P102. 11. Provide information to show that the waste anesthetic gas disposal system complies with the requirements of NFPA 99, Chapter 4 (1996 edition) for materials of construction, piping installation, location of the WAGD producer, termination of the WAGD, and that the installation of the WAGD producer complies with the manufacturer's listing requirements. Reference Appendix F, UPC 1994, as amended by the State of Arizona. 12. Provide a detail showing the support of the WAGD piping and ceiling mounted inlets as noted in keynote 2 on sheet P102. 13. Special Inspection of the medical gases and the WAGD system is required. Reference Section 306, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. |
| 01/28/2005 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Minimum font size is 10 point, which is a little over 1/8". 2. Sheet E100, Note 9, change the reference "NEC 1999" to "NEC 2002," global. 3. Panel/Circuit Designation B-20 is indicated from EF -5 in Equip 116. However, B-20 also powers receptacles in Rms 103 and 141. And the Efs are already on Ckt B-19. Pls clarify. 4. Panel/Circuit Designation B-17 is indicated from receptacle in near Evap 1. However, B-13, 15, 17 is a 3-phase circuit powering Evap 1. Pls clarify. 5. If the intent of the 15AF on Keynote 25 Sheet E101 is to provide overload protection for the Evap, please note that the next largest fuse size is 10A, not 15. (6.6) (1.25) = 8.25. However, if this was sized per manufacturer's recommendations, please disregard. 6. Please provide control diagram for the operation of the Evap. 7. It is unclear how Note 2 on Motor Connection Schedule Sheet E600 pertains to the Evap. 8. Please coordinate with Mechanical to note all power requirements for the Evap, not just the blower. 9. Please coordinate with Mechanical to clarify why RTU-2, at 3 HP, would have a lower MCA than RTU-1 at 2 HP. It also appears that the MCA values for RTUs on the Air Handling Unit Schedule do not have a reasonable correspondence to the KW values on the Motor Connection Schedule Sheet E600. It appears that the data on the electrical plans may be correct and that the Mechanical values are "typos." 10. Please clarify with Mechanical what "MOP" signifies on the Air Handling Unit Schedule. If this is supposed to mean MOCP, or Maximum OverCurrent Protection, pls clarify why the numbers do not correspond to standard CB/fuse sizes. 11. It is unclear where Air Handling - Condensing Unit Interconnection Detail" , referenced in Note 1 on Motor Connection Schedule Sheet E600, is. Please clarify. 12. For equipment ERV-3 on the Motor Connection Schedule Sheet E600, there is no power either on the line diagram or panel schedules. Might this be ERU-1 on Ckt B-8,10,12? 13. Ckt B-34,36 for receptacle for future X-Ray. Pls confirm that this is plug-in equipment which does not need a disconnect. 14. Please fill in requisite information on Panel Schedule for Ckt B-22, which powers receptacles in the area of Waiting 101. 15. Ckt B-18 powers receptacles in the area of Reception 102. On Panel Schedule this Ckt is part of a 3-phase feed to Radiant Heat. Pls clarify. 16. Please clarify the intent to provide for Auxiliary Heat, Ckts A-13 and A-14, and why they would have a receptacle outlet. RTU heaters are gas-powered. 17. Provide conductor sizes, typical. Suggest to specify a minimum conductor size, such as #12 for 20A circuits, and otherwise specify conductor sizing on a circuit-by-circuit basis. 18. Phone System Diagram Sheet E600 refers to "NEC70 830D". Please clarify this reference, as there is no Article 70 in the NEC. 19. Sheet E601 refers to PG & E as TEP in the note under Power Riser Diagram. PG & E is Pacific Gas and Electric, not Tucson. There once was an entity TG & E, or Tucson Gas and Electric, but the gas company was split off years ago, and there have been two separate entities, Tucson Electric Power Company and Southwest Gas, for many years. 20. Remove reference to PG & E in Keynote 1 Sheet E601. This location is in the Tucson Electric Power Company service territory. 21. Grounding Schedule on Sheet E601 makes reference to 1999 NEC sections. Update these to their 2002 equivalents. 22. Specifications 16450 call for only two service ground electrodes, the water piping system and a Ufer as made electrode. Grounding System Diagram on Sheet E601 calls for these to be concrete-encased and steel ground rods. Please coordinate and clarify, noting the requirements of NEC 250.50 (A) (3). 23. Please submit catalogue cut sheets for Fixtures E3, M and L1. All exterior fixtures shall comply with the Lighting Ordinance http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Outdoor_Lighting_Code.pdf and be clearly listed for damp or wet locations as appropriate. Exterior Lighting per 2002 IECC 805.5. 24. Submit Lighting Power Budget per Table 805.4.2 2000 IECC. 25. Total connected load and total demand load on Panels A and B do not reflect totals from Phases A, B, and C, and may be confusing for future reference. 26. Please submit fault calculations. TEP publishes its AFC in its Electrical Service Requirements SR-510, for 600A service entrance rating to be 55,600A. Would need to see it demonstrated how this becomes 11,634A at 43'. |
| 01/31/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Floodplain Use Permit T04OT01507 |
| 02/01/2005 | Gerry Koziol | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs manhole tap permit. needs wastewater-iwc review- Tom Tomchak- 579-5771. Exterior trench drains on west side of building may not prevent wastewater intrusion into public sewer. |
| 02/11/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/11/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. Zoning will re-review and if possible approve the building plans on the next submittal providing all commercial reviewers have approved the building plans. |
| 02/21/2005 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Provide 2 means of egress as per sec. 1002 , 1003.6 and table 1004.2. 2) Provide proper separation of exits as per swec. 1014.2.1. 3) All structural analysis design shall be done using the 2003 IBC. Specify and show On both the calcs and the plans 4) Provide the complete lateral analysis for both seismic and wind loading using the IBC 2003 NOT the UBC 97! 5) Sheet 20 of calcs refers to some sheet , but does not say what sheet. Sheet 19 of calcs indicates OK but does not explain why. 6) RESUBMIT PLANS FOR RE-REVIEW. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |