Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T04CM04208
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire hydrant required. Submit approved COT Water Plan. |
| 01/20/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 20, 2005 TO: Paul Nzomo, Coronado Engineering SUBJECT: Landscape Material Facility, Site Plan and Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM04208 and T04BU02306 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Site Plan, Grading Plan and Drainge Report (DR) were not approved at this time. Drainage Report Comments 1. As previously commented, throughout the text of the report and the figures, there are many inconsistencies concerning the extent of the project site. Clarify the figures and text so that the affected property is clearly defined. The drainage report should analyze the whole parcel. (Development Standard (DS) 10-02.2.3.1.2) See the annotations in the drainage report returned with the plans for correction. 2. As previously commented, clarify the relationship between concentration points 1 and 4 and the project site. Both of these concentration points appear to be downstream from the project site. Clarify whether ponding or backwater effects impact the parcel under review. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2) 3. As previously commented, remove the statement on page 3, "The site is not in a balanced or critical basin … see figure 6." 4. As previously commented, provide results of a percolation test demonstrating that the retained volume in the basins will be disposed of within 24 hours. The percolation test results should be included in the drainage report. The site plan has been revised to indicate the use of a 12-inch bleed pipe from each of the basins. Demonstrate that the bleed pipe will be designed so the retention requirements will be met. 5. Present the calculations used to delineate the floodplain limits. Clearly identify the hydraulic cross-sections on the site plan. If the limits are based on the Century Park master drainage report, provide copies of the relevant sections of that drainage report. (DS) 10-02.2.3.1.4.E) 6. As previously commented, revise the site plan in the drainage report to include all of the required elements from DS 10-02.2.3.1.6. This shall include the following: location, size and type of inflow and outflow structures, with dimensions and elevations; location and size of maintenance access ramps and roadways; and maximum water-surface elevations and the limits of ponding. Any other applicable requirements must also be included. 7. Provide the required routing sheets for each basin as described in DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.B. Include all of the supporting calculations. Also provide enough input data to demonstrate that the provided routing output is consistent with the proposed basins with their inlet and outlet structures. 8. As previously commented, show how the stated inflow into the basin will be directed to the basins. 9. Show that the discharge from the project area will maintain the existing flow characteristics after the proposed improvements are completed. 10. Show that the project will be provided with all-weather access. Provide calculations showing depth of flow across the private access easement. Provide documentation that the private access easement is available to be used by this project. Include recordation information 11. Determine and delineate on each site plan the erosion hazard setback for each of the drainageways. Site Plan and Grading Plan Comments. 12. Clearly show and label the flood-prone areas on the site plan. Show water surface contours at least every 200 feet. 13. Clearly show the locations of proposed weirs and channels. Show erosion control structures and surface treatments. Erosion control must be provided for the ends of each bleed pipe. 14. In a note, state that the grading will conform to City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0. 15. The basin routing pages in the drainage report appear to indicate that the basins will have outlet weirs. Provide details, dimensions and elevations for each weir. 16. Clarify on the plan view the surface treatment for the areas labeled "FINISHED GOODS", and "MATERIAL STORAGE MOUNDS" as well as other areas within the proposed development. 17. Show the sight visibility triangles for access onto Littletown Road. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10) 18. Show points of egress and ingress including the width of driveways. Provide recordation information or other evidence demonstrating that this project has permission to perform the paving improvements required along the driveway.(DS 2-02.2.1.A.11) 19. Show and label the solid waste container location and access thereto fully dimensioned. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.32) 20. Indicate the area of disturbance and show grading limits. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and submitted. Include a completed copy of the ADEQ checklist showing where in the plan each requirement has been met. Revise the Site Plan, Grading Plan and the Drainage Report to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the site/grading plan and two copies of the SWPPP and Drainage Report. In order to ensure that the next submittal will be approvable please schedule a meeting with with me to discuss these comments. Please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 01/23/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments. |
| 01/23/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Paul Nzomo 1010 N. Finance Center Ste 200 Tucson, AZ 85710 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM04208 Landscape Material Facility 6671 E. Littletown Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: January 23, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide a connection between all buildings and between the buildings and the right-of-way along Littletown Road. It is understood from the response comments that a Development Standard Modification Request will be submitted. If approved place the DSMR case number, date of approval and conditions on the site plan. DS 2-08.4.1.A DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 DS 2-02.2.1A.38 2. As acknowledged in response comments, a lot combination is required. Provide lot combination documents including Assessor's lot combo docs and notarized/recorded covenant. 3. Provide recordation information (docket and page reference) for all existing and proposed easements, including the existing gas line road, on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 4. Revise handicap parking detail to be consistent with the site plan drawing. An 8-foot van accessible h/c aisle is required if the spaces are only as wide as shown on the detail. ANS/IBC If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 01/27/2005 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per must be provided, 33% of tress shall be 24" box or larger. A minimum of (2) shrubs for each tree is required per DS 10.01. Additional planting for the basins is required. 2. Submit NPP plan Including: An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60', showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2-15.3.1.A.2. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one (1) year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. 3. All Protected Native Plants shall be planted in densities and configurations to approximate the natural character of the Sonoran Desert Per LUC 3.8.6.6. Ferocactus wislezenii are not planted in a natural configuration revise planting plan as necessary. 4. Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4, 20% of shrubs in landscape border are required to be 5 gallon size per DS 2-06.3.5.F 5. The Vehicular use area must include post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Provide barricades for all the vehicle use areas including access to other portions of the site per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 6. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each (10) motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Additional tree is required for the west portion of the parking lot per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 7. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. |
| 01/31/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit NPP plan Including: An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60', showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2-15.3.1.A.2. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one (1) year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. 2. All Protected Native Plants shall be planted in densities and configurations to approximate the natural character of the Sonoran Desert Per LUC 3.8.6.6. Ferocactus wislezenii |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/01/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |