Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM04174
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/16/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/17/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Previously approved development plan indicates that protected trees (Prosopis velutina) are located within the landscape median if any trees are removed mitigation will apply per LUC TABLE 3.8.6-I |
| 09/17/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise landscape plan to include the same quantities and species of shrubs and trees indicated in the landscape legend within the Development Plan Case #D01-008 per CCD Policy 4 (4.8) 2. Choose symbols that reflect the ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.c 3. Previously approved development plan indicates that protected trees (Prosopis velutina) are located within the landscape median if any trees are removed mitigation will apply per LUC TABLE 3.8.6-I |
| 10/04/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Philip Hawtin Summit Project Delivery 8916 Cardiff Place Stockton, CA 95210 (209) 481-9497 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner Development Services Dept. FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T04CM04174 T-Mobile Kiosk 1790 E. Irvington Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: October 5, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed as a less than 25% expansion. DS 2-02 2. Between any building and PAAL, a minimum 5-foot pedestrian refuge area is required. The refuge areas must include a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk that is physically separate from the PAAL. There is no pedestrian refuge area shown along the west side of the proposed building. Please detail and dimension pedestrian sidewalk/refuge areas adjacent to the buildings. Also, a minimum 4-foot sidewalk is required between the south side of the building and the parking area. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 DS 2-08.4.1.C 3. A wheelstop curb must be placed in the northernmost parking space where vehicles may park and overhang the required pedestrian sidewalk (see comment 2). Dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Wheelstop curbing is to be located 2-½ feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C 4. Pedestrian circulation must be continuous and show direct connections between the buildings and adjacent rights-of way. Show pedestrian connection to other buildings and adjacent streets. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 DS 2-08.4.1.A & .D 5. For microfilming/archiving purposes, all lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 (0.12") point in size. Please revise all text to meet this standard. DS 2-05.2.1.C 6. Indicate in the site data that the required MS&R street perimeter yard building setback along Irvington Road is the greater of 21 feet or height of exterior structure wall measured from the back of future curb location. LUC 3.2.6.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/05/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/08/2004 | Doug Williams | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 11, 2004 Site Review - T Mobile (Campbell/Irvington) Engineering Division Comments Development Services Department Reviewer: Doug Williams, Sr. Engineering Associate 1. Label the structure's proposed finished floor elevation on sheets Z-2 and Z-3, relative to the elevations provided with the submittal package (ALTA Survey). 2. Provide a detail, fully labeled and dimensioned, for the proposed addition of a dumpster within the existing onsite dumpster enclosure. Depict solid waste vehicle maneuverability and accessibility to the enclosure, in accordance with Development Standard 6-01.0 (Dev. Std 2-02.2.1 A 32). 3. The existing enclosure depicted does not match the approved Development Plan (D01-008), and appears to be in conflict with a nearby loading zone. The Development Plan may need to be submitted for review and approval for this revision prior to, or in conjunction with a resubmittal. Please contact Patricia Gehlen, Zoning/CDRC Manager or her designee, for clarification of this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 791-5550 ext. 1189, or via email at DWillia1@ci.tucson.az.us |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/20/2004 | LISA LESNY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |