Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T04CM03934
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/15/2004 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Required clearance for water closet. no ptrusion allowed into clearance space see section 307.2 ANSI A117.1. 2. Fastener attachment would penetrate roof membrane. Clarify? |
| 09/15/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide statistical data referenced in the response letter; specifically for the break room, conference room, and the lobby. |
| 09/15/2004 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. "There is electrical load on Ckt P-9 on Lighting Plan. Document such on panel schedule." UNRESPONSIVE. Put electrical load for Office Lights on Panel P Circuit 9. 2. "Provide panel and circuit number for conference room lights" THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE FIRST SUBMITTAL. It appears that electrical load on P-3, which not powers both the Break Room and the Conference Room lights, should show a minimum of 1.1 VA, not 0.4. 3. "Ckt P-22, with 7 receptacles, shall have a minimum load load of 1260 VA, which is greater than the 0.4 KVA indicated on the panel schedule" THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE FIRST SUBMITTAL. Ckt P-22, with 5 receptacles, shall have a minimum load load of 900 VA, which is greater than the 0.4 KVA indicated on the panel schedule. 4. The Water Heater is 1500 W according to Sheet P1, and 500 VA on Ckt P-35. Coordinate with Plumbing and clarify was wriiten upon first submittal. 5. Specify interrupting rating of the new fuse at the service disconnect, as requested on first submittal. |
| 09/15/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the sizes of the water piping based on Section 610.4, UPC 1994, Appendix A is not appropriate due to the project conditions. 2. Correct the fixture units shown on the fixture unit schedule for the existing hose bibb. |
| 09/23/2004 | TACHONG1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/23/2004 | TACHONG1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/23/2004 | TACHONG1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |