Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM03890
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/25/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/25/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 |
| 08/25/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include with re-submittal any previously approved landscape plans for The Keys and shopping center. 2. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way per Luc 3.7.2.4 as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4. 3. Provide calculation for oasis area including water feature per DS 2-06.2.2.H. Oasis area is calculated by multiplying the net site area by 2½ % 4. Ornamental water features, such as fountains or ponds, may be used, if all the conditions indicated in LUC 3.7.4.4 are met. 5. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 6. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 |
| 08/30/2004 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Sheet C1 is acceptable as part of the Site Plan. Include a second sheet of the proposed site at a Scale of 1" = 20'. 3. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. D.S. 2-05.2.1.C Correct and revise all sheets. 4. Indicate lot dimensions and bearings. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Text too small, correct and revise. 5. Indicate all existing buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Indicate roof direction/drainage. D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E 6. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 7. Clearly identified vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The minimum acceptable width for two-way paved roadway is 24'. Show dimension for driveways and PAALs. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 8. Indicate drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. Do not obstruct offsite to onsite flows. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16 9. Indicate if street is Public or Private. Wetmore Road is a MS&R with Future R.O.W. of 120 feet which intersects with Oracle Road requiring a widening of 150 feet. Correct and revise. Closed unused driveways/curb cuts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 10. Dimension all existing and future right-of-way. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 11. If applicable, indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 13. The proposed expansion is within a retention basin. A drainage and a soils report are required. Indicate relocation of retention basin to meet City of Tucson drainage requirements under the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management for this site. |
| 09/27/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD) 1. When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. This review is based on 7% percent building area expansion to the overall shopping center resulting in a full code compliance review of the expansion area only. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.B) 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (.12") point or greater in size. 3. Note the building height of all existing buildings. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 4. Please add the following note: "No additional bicycle parking is required for this expansion". (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) 5. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10) 6. Exterior stairs next to the private dining area shall be connected to the on-site pedestrian sidewalk. Minimum width for a pedestrian sidewalk is four (4) feet and constructed with concrete or any other surface listed under D.S. 2-08.5.1.C. (D.S. 2-08) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12) 7. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed free standing sign/s and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25) 8. Provide the loading space calculation and label and dimension the existing and propsoed loading zones on the plan. The gross floor area has exceeded 60,000 square feet of gross floor area with this expansion, which results in three (3) loading zones required for the shopping center. Refer to LUC 3.4.5.3 for number and size required and LUC 3.4.5 for location requirements. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5) 9. Label and dimension existing and future right-of-way and curb location for Wetmore Road. Per the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, Wetmore Road is designated for a total right-of-way of 120 feet. Building setback requirement may not be verified for compliance until this information has been added to the plan.(D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21) 10. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements and abandoned easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 11. Label the zoning classifications for the adjacent properties on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 12. What is the principal use of the business? The site data block on sheet C1 indicates two (2) separate land uses restaurant and bar. Each use has its own "subject to" criteria which has to be listed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/28/2004 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/29/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |