Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM03829
Parcel: 116277210

Review Status: Stopped

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE

Permit Number - T04CM03829
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE
Review Status: Stopped
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/20/2004 Andrew Connor NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. Include correct legal description including subdivision and lot number per DS 2-02.2.1.2

2. According to approved tentative and final plat Case #98-065 lot #12 allowable grading limits and undisturbed natural area do not coincide with the Site/Grading/HDZ plan submittal. Extent of allowable grading is 4000-sq. ft. Under no circumstances shall development occur within Undisturbed Natural Area B as shown on City of Tucson Subdivision Map & Plats: Book 53 @ Page 6 per LUC 3.8.6.4.

3. Boundaries of all set aside areas shall be clearly delineated on site plan, and fenced per Development Standard 2-06.2.2.F for the duration of any construction activities. (Ord. No. 9246, §1, 10/11/99)

4. Note on site plan:

· All disturbed areas including utility trenches or septic leaching fields, which are not located in parking or driveway areas, will be revegetated in compliance with DS 9-04.3.2


· Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed plants and natural desert areas per DS 2-6.0 Figure-1

· Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140.
09/07/2004 Doug Williams ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: 240 S. Corte Tortuga Vista
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 7 September 2004
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM03829/T04BU02066
T14S, R13E, Section 17

Resubmittal Required: Revised Site/Grading/HDZ Plan, copies of the approved Tentative and Final Plats.

SUMMARY: A thorough and proper review could not be performed with the material submitted, and Engineering Division approval is not recommended at this time. The plan submitted does not demonstrate compliance with development requirements indicated on the approved Tentative and Final Plats, and associated exhibits. Resubmittal shall include copies of the stamped/approved Tentative and Final Plats and a revised SITE/GRADING/HDZ PLAN demonstrating conformance to all applicable plat requirements for this subdivision. The comments listed below must be addressed prior to resubmittal. Additionally, address any redlines on the plans that are not listed below in comment format, on a revised SITE/GRADING/HDZ PLAN.

1. Provide a soils report with geotechnical recommendations for this site development. The report should address specific drainage, setbacks, terracing, and interceptor swale recommendations/requirements, in addition to typical soils report contents.
2. Clearly depict and label all grading limits on the plan.
3. Provide a note that site grading shall be in conformance with the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) - local amendment (Chapter 36 - Excavation and Grading). For further information, visit http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/2000_IBC_Amendments.pdf
4. Depict and label all easements and utility locations.
5. Revise General Notes #'s 1, 2, 3, 6 & 7.
6. Provide a contour interval.
7. The revised plan must demonstrate conformance to all Hillside Development grading, revegetation and stabilization requirements outlined in Development Standard 9-04.3.1- 9-04.3.3.

Subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. The comments provided above do not represent a thorough review. Additional information must be provided as noted in the summary, prior to provision of a complete Site/Grading/HDZ plan review.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
09/11/2004 David Rivera ZONING REVIEW Denied September 11, 2004

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Senior Planner

Comments:

1. The plan has been reviewed by the Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.
09/15/2004 Neil Saunders BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied Plan Check Comments - Project #T04CM03829

Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken.

General Requirements

1. All corrections and revisions shall be made on the original tracings and two new sets of prints or (1) sepia and (1) blue line shall be returned.
2. Pen and pencil corrections on final prints will not be acceptable. To avoid delays ensure all corrections have been made, are complete and have been coordinated on all-applicable details and notes.
3. Plans are hard to read. Many notes and specs are illegible. Rectify

Site Plan

1. Provide Zoning and Engineering approved site plan.
2. Indicate the location of gas, water, electric and sewer or septic line on the property, and where they enter the building. Provide the location of your water meter and septic system if it exists.

Floor Plan

1. Provide tempered glass at master bedroom French door sidelight.
2. Note that bathtub and shower enclosures shall be finished per P2710 with ceramic tile, or a listed enclosure, to a height of 72" above the drain per R702.4 and R307.2.
3. Note and specify that shower enclosures shall have a minimum finished interior area of 1,024 square inches and shall be capable of encompassing a minimum 30" circle per UPC SEC. 410.0. All glass enclosures shall be tempered.
4. Show that each water closet is located in a clear space not less than 30" wide and has a clear space in front not less than 21" per R307.2 (figure).
5. Provide ½" gypsum board on all walls common to the garage and house in compliance with R309.2. Where separation is a floor-ceiling assembly, the structure supporting the separation shall also be protected by a minimum ½" gypsum board or equivalent per R309.2.
6. Notes on floor plan - #2, "Exterior wall construction to be ..?.". Add wall-framing specs.
7. MEC calculations callout "Window, metal frame: Double pane SHGC" as U=.5. Plans show "Window XO SH as U=.87. Clarify.

Foundation Plan

1. 3/6: provide footing width.
2. 1/6 and optional footing detail: Note 6" to bottom of sill plate, treated sill plate.
3. 2/6: Note depth of footing (12") into undisturbed soil, 6" to bottom of sill plate.

Structural Plan

1. Specify all TJI TYPES. 11-7/8" 110 TJI over foyer/porch is inadequate- Resize.
2. Callout 3-16d fasteners at all ledger connections.
3. Note and detail tie straps, framing anchors, post caps and joist hangers by type, size and required attachment to framing members.
4. Note and dimension that the fireplace chimney must terminate not less than 3' above the point where the chimney passes through the roof, per R1001.6.

Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Plan

1. Note meter size (minimum 1-1/2") and resize supply line from meter to 1-1/4". Reference table 6-4, 1996 UPC.
2. Gas line; Provide 1-1/4" line to kitchen/utility appliances.
3. Range vent
4. Provide GFI note at all bathroom receptacles.
5. Note that all smoke detectors must be interconnected with a power source from the building wiring, and shall be equipped with battery backup.
6. Where ceiling fans are shown on the plans, provide a note indicating only approved outlet boxes shall be used, per E4001.6.

If you have any questions, please contact your assigned plans examiner Neil Saunders at 791-5550, extension 1113.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/17/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Stop
08/19/2004 ANY OUT TO CUSTOMER Stopped