Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T04CM03605
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Add notes to Site / Grading plan regarding HDZ: Existing trees with four (4) inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti will be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti will be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring revegetation, whenever possible. Revegetation. All disturbed areas including utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be revegetated in compliance with the following requirements. 1. All plants used in revegetation must be the same as the native vegetation on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing. 2. Revegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants. a. Desert trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading. b. Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting or any other method approved by the Zoning Review Section at DSD. Remove note regarding depress all land. |
| 11/02/2004 | SEPTIC APPROVAL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/15/2004 | Neil Saunders | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Locate all tiedowns on foundation plan. Foundation plan calls out HPAHD22 @ locations that called out as PAHD42 on floor plans. Clarify. 2. Gas Pipe at meter should be 2". 3. Revide fixture units per table 6-3, 1994 UPC. Provide total developed length for water supply. 4. Provide combustion and relief vents for water heater and furnance in laundy room. 5. MEC - Provide MEC calculations. Table provided has a window area to wall area ratio that is absent. HDD for Tucson is 2100. Callout insulation in ceilings on cross sections and details. Provide U values for all windows If you have any questions, please contact your assigned plans examiner Neil Saunders at 791-5550, extension 1113. |
| 11/18/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/23/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | November 23, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: A response letter to the previous zoning comments could not be found in the recent plan submittal. Zoning will re-review the plans on the next submittal. To insure that the plan can be approved please attach a response letter to the zoning comments. 1. The Zoning Review Section has reviewed but cannot the plan until all comments by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections have been addressed and both sections have approved the plan. 2. Please address Zoning Comments and concerns and re-submit the plans for review. 3. The legal description implies that a portion of lot 37 has been incorporated with lot 36. Please clarify if a lot split or lot reconfiguration has been approved by the City of Tucson. If the lot split or reconfiguration has not been processed for review and approval please call me for more information about the process. 4. Draw and label the visitor parking spaces as required by the tentative plat. Please insure that the visitor parking spaces do not interfere with access to the garage or the garage entry doors. 5. It appears that the new pad has significantly changed as shown on the approved tentative plat. New pad location must be approved by the Engineering and Landscape Sections before Zoning can approve the plans. ACS calculation must be inclued and approved by the Engineering Section. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/29/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/29/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |