Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM03496
Parcel: 117092110

Address:
215 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04CM03496
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/04/2004 Joseph Linville LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property or MS&R lines, and located entirely on site per LUC 3.7.2.4. Portion of landscape buffer along 22nd Street is located within the right of way.

2. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g

3. Additional street landscape border is required along Herbert St. per LUC 3.7.2.4

4. Provide a 30" continuous screen along 22nd and Herbert Streets per LUC Table 3.7.2-1

5. Screens may be located in the landscape border if the criteria indicated in LUC3.7.3.2 are met. Vegetative screens shall not extend more than three (3) feet into the street landscape border

6. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation.

7. Note on plan: All disturbed, areas including areas between side walk and the curb shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7

8. Show the location of refuse storage per DS 2-02.2.2.1.A.32

9. A 6' screen for refuse storage is required for adjacent properties LUC Table 3.7.2-I

10. Submit NPPO plan per DS 2-15.0 or Application for Exception including documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement that Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C
08/04/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO plan per DS 2-15.0 or Application for Exception including documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement that Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C
08/05/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/16/2004 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: August 16, 2004
TO: Andrew Dennehy
SUBJECT: 22nd Street Kiosk
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM03496

SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on August 16, 2004. The site plan was not approved. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:
1) Revise the site plan and grading plan to show how water harvesting will be used to the maximum extent practicable. Show areas that will be depressed to serve as water harvesting areas and show how stormwater will be directed to these areas. (LUC 3.7.4)
2) Show the sight visibiltiy triangles along Herbert Avenue. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10)
3) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.17)
4) Label 22nd Street as a Major Street and Routes arterial. Label the future right-of-way width. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19)
5) Show the proposed location of the refuse container and show how it will be serviced by Environmental Services or by a commercial hauler. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.32)

Revise the Site Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed.

Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
08/27/2004 Daniel Castro ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were
addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD)

1. Add a location map to sheet 1. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4)

2. Disabled access aisle shall be marked so as to discourage parking in them. (ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Sec. 502.3.3)

3. Disabled parking space and access aisle shall have surface slopes not steeper than 1:48. Access aisles shall be at the same level as the parking spaces they serve. (ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Sec. 502.4)

4. A minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk area is required along the west and east sides of the proposed building. The plan shows a 3'6" sidewalk area. (D.S. 2-08.3.1) (D.S. 2-08.5.1.A)

5. Indicate graphically or by note, if the sidewalk west of the building is flush with the access aisle. If sidewalk is not flush with access aisle please provide a disabled access ramp in compliance with Section 405 ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998. Access aisles shall be part of the accessible route to the building or facility entrance and shall comply with Section 402 ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998.

6. Provide a detail of the handicap parking sign. The sign shall include the International Symbol of Accessibility complying with Section 703.7 ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998. The sign shall be 60 inches minimum above the floor or ground surface of the parking space, measured to the bottom of the sign.

7. If vehicle cross access with the adjacent property to the west is proposed, provide a copy of the vehicular cross access agreement. The agreement must be recorded prior to site plan approval. If cross access is not proposed, provide a barrier to prevent vehicles from crossing the property line. In addition, a back-up spur will be required for the handicap parking space. Refer to D.S. 3-05.2.2.D for design criteria. The spur shall be fully dimensioned on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11)

8. Provide the bicycle parking calculation. Per Land Use Code Section 3.3.3.5, the number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided (8% of 4 vehicle parking spaces provided). If the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). Per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.8, any use providing less than 50 motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. For an explanation of Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking spaces, see Development Standard 2-09 and LUC Sec. 6.2.3. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4)

9. Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the proposed bicycle parking spaces. Indicate graphically or by note, the location, specific type of rack and the number of bicycle it supports. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9)

10. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10)

11. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and or proposed free standing signage, billboard, and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.1.A.13)

12. Refer to Landscape Review comments regarding the required on-site 10 foot wide Landscape border. A Major Streets and Routes covenant may be required to be recorded along with a site plan showing how the site will be compliance upon future right-of-way widening. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19)

13. Label and dimension the MS&R future curb location along 22nd Street. Contact the Engineering Reviewer for information on location. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21)

14. Under the project data block, add "Food and Beverage Sales development designator 28" to the proposed use note. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31)

15. Indicate the location of the refuse container. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32)

16. Under the project data block, revise lot coverage to floor area ratio F.A.R. (gross floor area divided by gross site area). The lot coverage calculation is not required to be listed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
08/28/2004 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied 1. Disabled access aisle shall be marked so as to discourage parking in them. (ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Sec. 502.3.3)

2. Disabled parking space and access aisle shall have surface slopes not steeper than 1:48. Access aisles shall be at the same level as the parking spaces they serve. (ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Sec. 502.4)

3. A minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk area is required along the west and east sides of the proposed building. The plan shows a 3'6" sidewalk area. (D.S. 2-08.3.1) (D.S. 2-08.5.1.A)

4. Indicate graphically or by note, if the sidewalk west of the building is flush with the access aisle. If sidewalk is not flush with access aisle please provide a disabled access ramp in compliance with Section 405 ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998. Access aisles shall be part of the accessible route to the building or facility entrance and shall comply with Section 402 ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998.

5. Provide a detail of the handicap parking sign. The sign shall include the International Symbol of Accessibility complying with Section 703.7 ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998. The sign shall be 60 inches minimum above the floor or ground surface of the parking space, measured to the bottom of the sign.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/03/2004 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/03/2004 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed