Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM03346
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/23/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/23/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a copy of the previously approved landscape plan. 2) Identify Common Area 'A' on the site and landscape plans. |
| 08/09/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 9, 2004 TO: Don R. Waid, Design Results, LLC SUBJECT: Dollar Storage Expansion, Site Plan and Grading Plan REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM03346 andT04BU01771 SUMMARY: The Site Plan, Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Grading Plan and SWPPP were not approved at this time. Site Plan comments 1. Provide lot dimensions and bearings. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.5) 2. Show existing and future site visibility triangles for the intersection of Dragoon Street and Grant Road. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10) 3. Label Grant Road as a Major Streets and Routes arterial and dimension existing and future right-of-way. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19) 4. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the site plan. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.17) 5. Revise the new sidewalk to provide a minimum 5 feet of clear sidewalk width. (DS 3-01.4.1.A.1.a) 6. Show the existing refuse container location with a grapic showing the extent of the pad and showing access for service vehicles. ((DS 2-02.2.1.A.32) 7. Show drainage patterns, including roof drainage. Show that pedestrian routes and sidewalks will be kept flood-free for up to 10-year events. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.16) 8. Revise the site plan and grading plan to show how water harvesting will be used to the maximum extent practicable. Show areas that will be depressed to serve as water harvesting areas and show how stormwater will be directed to these areas. (LUC 3.7.4) Grading Plan comments: 9. Delineate and provide details of the water harvesting/landscape areas. 10. Clearly indicate the limits of grading. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) does not meet the standards of the AzPDES Construction General Permit. Revise the SWPPP so that it clearly applies to this project. In addition, the following comments address specific corrections that need to be made. 1. Part IV.C.1. Identify all operators for the project and the areas over which each operator has control. 2. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 3. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 4. Part IV.C.2.a. Describe the project and its intended use after NOT is filed 5. Part IV.C.2.b. Describe the intended sequence of disturbance activities. Revise the listed intended sequence so that it clearly applies to this project. 6. Part IV.C.4. Identify on the map or in a narrative, the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams, dry sloughs, arroyos. 7. Part IV.D.4.c. Describe record keeping efforts, include forms/checklists used for keeping the required data 8. Part IV.D.4.c.i. Maintain records of the dates when major grading activities occurred 9. Part IV.D.4.c.ii. Maintain records of when construction activities cease (temporarily or permanently) 10. Part IV.D.4.c.iii. Maintain records of when stabilization is initiated and completed and any reason for delays 11. Revise the instructions for managing concrete truck washout and surplus concrete discharge. Provide for a designated washout location that will be used when the washout cannot be used for or incorporated into a building. 12. Part IV.F. Include copy of AZPDES permit (AZG2003-001), NOI and ADEQ authorization as part of the SWPPP 13. Part IV.J.1. Each Operator must sign the SWPPP with the proper certification. Revise the Site Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP to address these comments and resubmit two copies of the site plan and SWPPP and three copies of the Grading Plan for review. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/19/2004 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/19/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD) 1. The following comments are based on a full code compliance review of the entire site as a result of a site area and building area expansion of greater than 25%. Site plan content and specifications are found in Development Standards 2-02. 2. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two (2) separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. A copy of the City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant is attached to the yellow site plan card or may be obtained online at www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2) 3. Add lot dimensions and bearings. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5) 4. List the size, height and use of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including overhangs and canopies. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 5. A minimum setback shall be provided between a building and an adjacent street as determined in Land Use Code (LUC) Table 3.2.6-I. The setback is projected on the projected street average daily traffic (ADT). Of the two (2) or more setback distances listed in Table 3.2.6-I for each ADT range, the building setback which provides the greatest distance from the street shall be provided. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7) 6. To verify compliance with vehicle parking requirements and loading zone requirements, please list the square footage for accessible storage units and non-accessible storage units. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4, .5) 7. Dimension parallel parking spaces. Minimum length required is 23 feet per LUC Table 3.3.7-I. Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.B.3, the minimum width for a parallel parking space abutting a building is ten (10) feet. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 8. The last approved development plan from 1997 attached to the new site plan shows a carport west of the existing apartment building. The proposed site plan makes no mention of it. If the carport is still there, please label and dimension. If the carport has been removed please state as so on your response letter addressing these comments. 9. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10) 10. Label and dimension all new parking area access lanes (PAALs). In addition, indicated graphically or by note, if they are to be one-way or two-way PAALs. 11. Parking Area Access Lanes (PAALs) in Storage Use Group Development. A one-way parking area access lane (PAAL) within a development for storage must be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge area delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. A two-way PAAL within a development for storage must be a minimum of thirty (30) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge area delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. (LUC 3.3.7.2.C.4) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 12. Will there be an entrance/exit along the south side of building 1? If so, a sidewalk must be provided from the entrance/exit to the public sidewalk located in the Grant Road right-of-way. (D.S. 2-08.4) 13. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free-standing signs, billboard, and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25) 14. Label and dimension the location of the existing loading zone. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) 15. Label the street name (Dragoon Street) on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18) 16. Dimension right-of-way for both streets. Grant Road is designated a Major Street and Route (MS&R) with a future right-of-way of 120 feet. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19) 17. Label and dimension the future curb location along Grant Road. Per the MS&R, the face of future curb is to be located nine (9) feet from the future right-of-way line. Building setback requirements may not be verified until this information has been provided. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21) 18. Under the proposed land use note, list the "subject to" section LUC 3.5.10.3.C and .F. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 19. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/23/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |