Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER
Permit Number - T04CM03295
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2000 International Mechanical Code is the relevant code for main building in this project. 2. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain for F-1 in the main building. Reference Section 307.2, IMC 2000 and Section 807.2, UPC 1994. 3. Provide calculations to show how the specified heat pump (F-1) is capable of maintaining a minimum temperature of 68°F in the interior spaces intended for occupancy on a design heating day (32°F). Reference Section 309.1, IMC 2000. 4. Provide calculations to show that the common ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2000. 5. Revise the specification for duct insulation as required to comply with Section 803.2.8, IECC 2000. Coordinate General Note #7 with Specification #2. |
| 02/11/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/11/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 1994 Uniform Plumbing Code with Arizona State Amendments. Revise the plumbing design accordingly. 2. Provide waste and vent isometrics. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 3. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 4. City of Tucson Ordinance 1802 requires a reduced pressure backflow preventer to be located immediately after the water meter. Please show the RPBP on the drawings and include the pressure drop on the water calculations. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 5. Show how the lift used in the water calculations is possible with a 2-story building with showers on the second floor. Reference Section 610.7 (3) or Section A 3.2, UPC 1994. 6. Include all fixtures, including those that are roughed in for future installation (e.g. clotheswasher), when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Include the plumbing fixtures for the loft (sheet A4) in the calculations if they are supplied by the same water meter. Reference Sections 412.0 and 610.1, UPC 1994. 7. Provide CW shut off valves for each building entrance. Reference Section 605.3, UPC 1994. 8. Coordinate the gas piping and gas-fired equipment shown on the plumbing plan with the gas demand schedule. Clarify which equipment is to be installed or roughed in under revision 2. 9. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream and the next downstream sanitary manholes and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 1994. 10. Substitution of alternate piping materials (Plumbing Notes #4) will require the submittal of a revision to the approved plans. Reference Section 301.1.1, UPC 1994. |
| 02/15/2005 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/03/2005 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 3/7/05 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM03295-R PROJECT NAME: Change single family residence to commercial use PROJECT ADDRESS: 5343 S. Civano Bl ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: Seaver / Franks Architects PROJECT REVIEWER: Christy Foreman TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) Cannot approve documents without a approved Development plan. 2) If choosing non-separated use for all of buildings on lot need to provide justification / clarification for table 503. Must be designed per most restrictive per 302.3.1. 3) If choosing separated use then clarification / justification must be provided per 302.3.2 and 704.3 buildings on the same lot. Revision must also be submitted for T04CM03452. 4) Clarify / justify 1 hr. fire wall @ garage/loft party wall per section 503.2 party walls shall be constructed as a fire wall in accordance with section 705, without openings and shall create separate bldgs. 2 hr. wall per table 705.4. 705.1 Fire walls constructed on lot lines shall be constructed without openings. 5) Provide structural analysis for structure per 2003 IBC. Approved per 2000 IRC is not adequate for a commercial building. 6) Sheet 7 structural calculations information missing - bad reproduction. 7) Clarify both buildings per table 602. 8) Clarify / justify openings per table 704.8 @ yoga instructor preparation room and garage / storage / loft. 9) Section 1505 fire classification for roof. 10) Clarify / justify section 1006 Means of egress illumination , 1006.2 Illumination level, 1006.3 Illumination Emergency power. |
| 03/09/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/11/2005 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to re-review prior to payment drawings not clear |
| 03/18/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Approved Development Plan required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |