Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM03156
Parcel: 11449036C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T04CM03156
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/06/2005 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The provided shop drawing shows two different hoods and nothing on the sealed drawing indicates that either of the hoods is to be used on this project. Please clarify. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
2. The provided structural calculations do not address the total load imposed on the roof trusses. In addition to the hood (513 pounds), the exhaust fan and curb (200 pounds), the 16 gauge grease exhaust duct with ceramic fire wrap, the supply ductwork, and the possible weight of personnel working on the hood (Section 507.6, IMC 2000) should be included in the calculations. Include the support details on the drawing.
06/07/2005 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The submitted plumbing drawings are incomplete and do not appear to address the project presented on the architectural drawings (e.g. gas piping, missing architectural background, kitchen plumbing fixtures not shown on the fixture schedule). Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
2. Revise the provided riser diagrams for the water and waste systems to clarify which fixtures are being installed. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
06/20/2005 DOUG LAAKSO BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied .. T04CM03156 .. 8625 E TANQUE VERDE ROAD .. DGL .. 1ST REVIEW .. 6/21/05 ..

S1. Provide up-to-date site plan showing property lines and location of work onsite.
S2. Provide roof plan dimensionally locating roof-mounted equipment from two adjacent sides of the roof.
S3. Clarify construction is to conform to the IBC.
S4. Show all loads on drawings per Mechanical Comments "1. The provided shop drawing shows two different hoods and nothing on the sealed drawing indicates that either of the hoods is to be used on this project. Please clarify. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
2. The provided structural calculations do not address the total load imposed on the roof trusses. In addition to the hood (513 pounds), the exhaust fan and curb (200 pounds), the 16 gauge grease exhaust duct with ceramic fire wrap, the supply ductwork, and the possible weight of personnel working on the hood (Section 507.6, IMC 2000) should be included in the calculations. Include the support details on the drawing."
S5. Provide framing and support details, revised structural calculations and seal and signature of Structural Engineer on drawing/s.
S6. Is this part of the school ('E'-Occupancy)? If this is part of the 'E'-Occupancy explain conformance on drawings vs Church multi-purpose room ('A2.1'-'A3'-Occupancy). The change of occupancy from chuch ('A2.1'-'A3' Occupancy) to a school ('E'-Occupancy) requires a Building Permit to show conformance, per IBC Section 3406 and 1997 UAC Section 309

Questions? Call Douglas Laakso Structural Plans Examiner for the City of Tucson Development Services Department at (520) 791-5550 x1111.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/29/2005 BETH GRANT OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/29/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed