Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T04CM03154
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/24/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD) 1. Easement providing access to rear parking lot must meet street standards as described in Development Standards 3-01.2. 2. A minimum 24-foot wide two-way drive (PAAL) is required to provide access from Stone Avenue to the garage. The vehicular use area shall provide a barrier to prevent vehicles from encroaching onto unimproved portions of the site. In addition, it may be necessary to provide a back up spur. Fully dimension back-up spurs on plan. (LUC Table 3.3.7-I) (D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1) (D.S. 3-05.2.2.D) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 3. Van accessible parking space is required to have an eight (8) foot wide access aisle. Plan shows five foot wide access aisle. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 4. Access point from alley must be minimum 24 feet wide for two-way travel. (LUC Table 3.3.7-I) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 5. Minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk (refer to D.S. 2-08.5.1.C for composition requirements) is required for the on-site pedestrian circulation system. Label and dimension sidewalk width and composition. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12) (D.S. 2-08.5.1) 6. Response acknowledged. Site plan shall not be approved until the all applicable easements have been recorded and information provided as required in previous comment. Previous comment remains: All existing and proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 7. Since variances will be applied for, please note the variance case number, date of approval, variances granted, and conditions imposed on the site plan. In addition, please provide a copy of the decision letter with the resubmittal of this plan. 8. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 02/25/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | refer to zoning review comments regarding width of access aisle. |
| 02/28/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 1, 2005 TO: Bob Lanning, Lanning Architecture SUBJECT: Morton Bed and Breakfast Site Plan for Change of Use REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM03154 SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on August 5, 2004. The site plan was not approved. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1) As previously indicated, the minimum width for two-way traffic aisles is 24 feet. The existing driveway must be revised to meet this standard. (DS 3-05.2.1.C.1) If a DSMR or Variance is approved, provide the case number on the plan. 2) As previously indicated, the proposed access to the new parking area does not have enough width to provide paved travel lanes and pedestrian use areas. Show how the access requirements will be met all the way to 17th Street or provide another access location to the proposed parking area. Provide recordation information for the access easement across the adjacent property. If a DSMR or Variance is approved, provide the case number on the plan. Access to the loading zone must be a minimum of 20 feet wide for one way traffic. 3) Provide written approval from Environmental Services for proposed solid waste collection proposal. Contact John Clark at 791-5543. 3 Revise the Site Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 03/02/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 2. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 3. Screening whether required or not, are to be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that the landscaping is visible from the street per LUC 3.7.3.2.B 4. Include variance case number, date of approval, variances granted, and conditions imposed on the site and landscape plans. Provide a copy of any decision letters with the re-submittals. |
| 03/02/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/02/2005 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/02/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |