Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM03154
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 07/19/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0. |
| 07/19/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property or MS&R lines, and located entirely on site per LUC 3.7.2.4. Street landscape border is a landscape area running the full length of the street property line bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. 2. Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 3. 20% of shrubs in landscape border are required to be 5 gallon size DS 2-06.3.5.F 4. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 5. Provide a 30" continuous screen along Stone Ave. per LUC Table 3.7.2-1 6. Screens may be located in the landscape border if the criteria indicated in LUC3.7.3.2 are met. Vegetative screens shall not extend more than three (3) feet into the street landscape border. 7. Show on site plan existing and future sight visibility triangles DS 2-02.2.2.1.A.10 8. Any screen higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle per LUC 3.7.3.4. Existing 6' masonry wall along front property line may be located within the SVT. 9. Screens, whether required or not, are to be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that the landscaping is visible from the street per DS 2-06.3.7.B.3 10. Criteria for turf areas are as follows: Except as provided by Sec. 3.7.2.2.C.4, turf areas are allowed only within the oasis area. Turf areas will be located to mitigate glare and reduce heat near buildings and their openings, including windows and patios, or to serve as an active play area, and if turf is grouped in separately programmed irrigation areas. Including the water harvesting system or storm water runoff design on the site is integrated with the turf area. The allowable oasis area is calculated by multiplying the net site area by 2.5%. 11. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 12. Landscape plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes per LUC 3.7.4.3.B 13. Landscaping along parking lots where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. 14. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 15. A 6' screen for refuse storage is required for adjacent properties LUC Table 3.7.2-I 16. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7 |
| 08/02/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD) 1. The following comments are based on a change of use requiring a full code compliance review of the entire site. 2. Easement providing access to rear parking lot must meet street standards as described in Development Standards 3-01.2. 3. Add a general note, which states the number of proposed rental units. 4. A minimum 24-foot wide two-way drive (PAAL) is required to provide access from Stone Avenue to the garage. The vehicular use area shall provide a barrier to prevent vehicles from encroaching onto unimproved portions of the site. In addition, it may be necessary to provide a back up spur. Fully dimension back-up spurs on plan. (LUC Table 3.3.7-I) (D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1) (D.S. 3-05.2.2.D) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 5. Dimension the width of the standard parking spaces. (LUC 3.3.7.2.A) 6. Provide a fully dimensioned detail of the handicap parking space, access aisle, and ramp. Width, length, slope, direction of slope shall be provided. Refer to ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Chapter 4 and 5 for specifications. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 7. Indicate graphically or by note the location and type of Class I bicycle parking proposed. For specifications refer to D.S. 2-09. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) 8. Bicycle parking area must be connected to the on-site pedestrian circulation system. (D.S. 2-08.3.1) 9. Project entry and directional signs shall be provided to direct bicyclists from the public right-of-way to the bicycle parking facility. (D.S. 2-09.5.1) 10. Show sight visibility triangles. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10) 11. Access point from alley must be minimum 24 feet wide for two-way travel. (LUC Table 3.3.7-I) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 12. Minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk (refer to D.S. 2-08.5.1.C for composition requirements) is required for the on-site pedestrian circulation system. Label and dimension sidewalk width and composition. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12) (D.S. 2-08.5.1) 13. If applicable, provide a detail of existing or proposed free-standing signage, billboard, and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.1.A.13) 14. LUC Sec. 3.4.5.5 requires one (1) 12' x 35' loading zone for the proposed use. Annotate the number and size required and provided. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5) 15. All existing and proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 16. Demonstrate how a person in a wheelchair will be able to open the gate located along the accessible pedestrian path. Refer to ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Sec. 308 for reach ranges. Manual gates shall comply with the requirements of Sections 404.2.1 through 404.2.11. 17. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/04/2004 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | refer to zoning review comments |
| 08/05/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 5, 2004 TO: Bob Lanning, Lanning Architecture SUBJECT: Morton Bed and Breakfast Site Plan for Change of Use REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM03154 SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on August 5, 2004. The site plan was not approved. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1) Stone Avenue is a Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) arterial route. Label and dimension the existing and future right-of-way limits. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19) 2) Show the sight visibiltiy triangles for the driveway (PAAL) into Stone Avenue. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10) 3) The minimum width for two-way traffic aisles is 24 feet. The existing driveway must be revised to meet this standard. (DS 3-05.2.1.C.1) 4) The proposed access to the new parking area does not have enough width to provide paved travel lanes and pedestrian use areas. Show how the access requirements will be met all the way to 17th Street or provide another access location to the proposed parking area. Provide recordation information for the access easement across the adjacent property. 5) Show drainage patterns including roof drainage and show finish grades throughout the site.. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.16) Revise the Site Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/06/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/06/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |