Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM02932
Parcel: 13104398A

Address:
4701 E 29TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T04CM02932
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/28/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/30/2004 Raul Palma BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1) Show location of beams (6B 8.5) and (10B 19) on plans.
They are called out on sheet 1 of calc`s.
07/06/2004 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Show how the support of the new heat pump (Details 5, 6, and 7/A2) complies with the listing requirements of the heat pump manufacturer. (Not shown on the Architectural drawings) Reference Section 304.1, IMC 2000.
2. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain from the new heat pump. Reference Section 307.2.1, IMC 2000.
07/06/2004 Robert Sherry PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a riser diagram for the water piping to show how the new piping relates to the existing piping. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
2. Revise the plumbing schedule to include all of the fixtures being fed by the same meter (e.g. water closets, ice machine, and hose bibb). Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994.
3. Show how the water piping was sized. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
4. Specify the type of backflow preventers to be used for each appliance being directly connected to the water distribution system. Reference Sections 102.3.2, 603.0, and 603.3.12, UPC 1994.
5. Provide indirect waste receptors for the ice machine, coffee machine, soda fountain, and any refrigeration equipment requiring a condensate drain. Reference Sections 801.0 and 803.0, UPC 1994.
07/06/2004 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
07/09/2004 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
07/22/2004 Doug Williams ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: 4701 E. 29th Street
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 23 July 2004
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM02932

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the permit application and hydrologic and hydraulic report. Approval is not recommended at this time. Please address the following comments:
1. This property is affected by regulatory flow in excess of 100 cubic feet/second (CFS) during the 100-year storm event, and must conform to floodplain development regulations - Chapter 26, Tucson Code. An engineering study review fee of $150.00 and floodplain use permit application fee of $50.00 will be required upon resubmittal.
DRAINAGE REPORT:
2. In accordance with the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (Development Standard 10-02.0), Sec. 2.3, the Hydrologic and Hydraulic Report submitted (as required by Sec. 26-11.2 A 2 (e), Tucson Code) must provide detailed discussion and analysis of the regulatory flow (170 cfs) from the 29th Street box culvert/storm drain system, discussed in section 2.1.
3. The report must reference and provide pertinent sheets of any "As-Built" drawings/improvement plans supporting the analysis and any determination of flow containment within the box culvert.
4. The report must demonstrate that the structure is not affected by regulatory flow (100-year storm) or, demonstrate conformance to floodplain use permit and floodway fringe development requirements, outlined in Sections 26-5.2, 26-11 and 26-11.2, at a minimum.
5. Omit reference in the report to the basin in section 1.6.
* Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of findings in the report *
GENERAL COMMENTS:
6. A Floodplain Use Permit will be required prior to, or in conjunction with permit approval for the proposed tenant improvement. Please complete and submit a Floodplain Use Permit application with a resubmittal.
7. If a determination is made in the report that the structure is affected during the 100-year storm event, a determination must be made as to whether the existing structure is to be substantially improved, as defined by floodplain regulations (see comment # 8).
8. Substantial improvement means any reconstruction, repair, rehabilitation, addition or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty (50) percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. If the value of the improvement exceeds 50% of the value of the existing structure, then substantial improvement requirements must be met, including full conformance to floodplain development requirements (floodway fringe development, floodproofing requirements, etc.), as defined in City Floodplain Regulations (Tucson Code, Sec. 26-2).
9. If the improvements to the existing structure amount to a substantial improvement, conformance to Section 26-4.1 - Nonconforming development - will be required. Subsection (a) "Improvements to, or Reconstruction of, Existing Nonconforming Development", states that "any structure which is substantially improved at a cost equal to or exceeding fifty (50) percent of the full cash value of the structure as shown on the latest assessment rolls of the county assessor either (a) before the improvement or repair is started, or (b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred, shall conform to these regulations". This information must be determined by submittal of the necessary documents (see comment # 10). A recent appraisal, specifying the value of the structure itself may be necessary and/or preferred, should a "substantial improvement" apply under this permit application.
10. The floodplain permit application must include a licensed contractor's estimate, itemizing the proposed improvements to the EXISTING STRUCTURE, to be performed under this permit. Materials, labor, and overhead must be included in the estimate.
11. An engineering study review fee of $150.00 and floodplain use permit application fee of $50.00 will be required upon submittal, and provide a response letter addressing all comments provided above at a minimum
For additional City Code information, go to: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/clerks/ or hard copies of the ordinance may be purchased on the 3rd Floor (City Engineer/Floodplain Office) in the Pima County/City of Tucson Public Works Building - 201 N. Stone Ave.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
07/26/2004 Linda Buczynski ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/29/2004 BETH GRANT OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/29/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed