Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM02683
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/28/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Needs WW 8th floor credit evaluation |
| 06/29/2004 | Robert Sherry | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the dryer exhaust ducts in lofts 2103, 2203, and 2302 to meet the requirements of Section 504.6.1, IMC 2000. 2. Provide detail to show how the secondary condensate drain is to function. |
| 06/29/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2000, for dormitory occupancy. 2. Revise detail 4/D-P1.6 to coordinate with the riser diagrams (no floor drains are shown on the riser diagrams). Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 3. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length) on the upper floors. Reference Section 707.4, UPC 1994 with State of Arizona amendments. 4. Provide suds relief for stacks containing suds-producing fixtures. Reference Section 711.0, UPC 1994. 5. Include the separate dishwasher connection in the fixture unit calculations. 6. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine need for backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 1994. 7. Provide rainwater calculations for the three flat roofs with parapets. Show how provisions are being made to provide overflow protection for the roofs. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. |
| 06/29/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included in the submittal. |
| 07/13/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval required prior to Zoning review of structural plans. |
| 07/13/2004 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Re; the kitchen and loft, is there a separation between them? Being that the typical unit floor plan shows a note stating all loft interior doors are AA. CLARIFY ! 2) Specify size of all windows. 3) What is the opening in the wall at the bath room walls? Sheet M-A1.2. 4) Show connection details for guardrail for guardrails at stairway handrails. 5) Specify spacing of guardrail ballisters. 4" MAX 6) Provide handrail extentions(12" ) as per section 1003.3.3.11.5. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/27/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/27/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |