Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM02682
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/24/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/28/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF NEW CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER-(6" PRIVATE SEWER NEEDS TO CONNECT TO A MANHOLE- EITHER NEW OR EXSISTING.) NEED WASTEWATER DESIGN REVIEW OF LIFT STATION- ROBERT BUECHER 617-6206 @ 100 N STONE AV-4TH FL. NEED WASTEWATER 8TH FL CREDIT EVALUATION. 740-6500 |
06/29/2004 | Robert Sherry | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the dryer exhaust ducts to meet the requirements of Section 504.6.1, IMC 2000. 2. Provide detail to show how the secondary condensate drain is to function. |
06/29/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the fixture schedule to include the floor drains. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 2. Indirect waste receptors shall not be installed in a cabinet or cupboard. Reference Section 804.1, UPC 1994. 3. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length) on the upper floor. Reference Section 707.4, UPC 1994 with State of Arizona amendments. 4. Include the separate dishwasher connection in the fixture unit calculations. 5. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine need for backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 1994. 6. Show how the rainwater is to be drained from patios 1305 and 1312. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. |
06/29/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/30/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | A copy of the stamped approved site plan must be included in the submittal. |
07/13/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval required prior to Zoning review of structural plans. |
07/13/2004 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/26/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Re; the kitchen and loft, is there a separation between them? Being that the typical unit floor plan shows a note stating all loft interior doors are AA. CLARIFY ! 2) Specify size of all windows. 3) What is the opening in the wall at the bath room walls? Sheet M-A1.2. 4) Show connection details for guardrail for guardrails at stairway handrails. 5) Specify spacing of guardrail ballisters. 4" MAX 6) Provide handrail extentions(12" ) as per section 1003.3.3.11.5. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
09/21/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
09/21/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |