Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM02272
Parcel: 136327910

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM

Permit Number - T04CM02272
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/21/2004 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
06/22/2004 Andrew Connor NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. Revise grading note to read: Site shall comply with CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 9-04.3.2 A&B Vegetation Retention and Revegetation and HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ) LUC 2.8.1

2. Add note: Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed plans and natural desert areas per
DS 2-6.0 Figure-1


3. Note: Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140.
06/29/2004 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied June 29, 2004
T04CM02272 and T04BU01477
Leitner Residence
Reviewer: Loren Makus

The building plan and grading plan cannot be approved at this time. Please revise the plans to meet the requirements of the following comments.

1. The Plat for Rancho Cancion West specifies that a Hillside Development Zone analysis must be submitted and approved before any permits are issued for this parcel. Submit a complete HDZ analysis.
2. The Plat specifies an access location for this parcel. Revise the plans so the access is at the specified location.
3. Provide a soils engineering report to comply with Section 12.2 of IBC 2000 Chapter 36. "Slope. The slope of cut surfaces shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use and shall be no steeper than 1 unit vertical in 2 units horizontal (50% slope) unless the permittee furnishes a soils engineering or an engineering geology report, or both, stating that the site has been investigated and giving an opinion that a cut at a steeper slope will be stable and not create a hazard to public or private property."
07/07/2004 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied See 8.5" x 11" instruction sheet for plot plans.

Provide setback dimension for all sides and provide plot plan calculations.

The approved plat required that the driveway provide access off of Placita Meregue and not off of Paseo Melodioso (per plat).

One (1) additional parking space, for a total of four (4), is required for having six (6) bedrooms. This parking space must be located on site and cannot in the front perimeter yard. (LUC Sec 3.5.7.1.G and .H).
07/14/2004 David Witt BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T04CM02272

7/16/04 4790 S. PASEO MELODIOSO

PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:

THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED
FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE.
2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS.

3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES.

SITE PLAN:

1. PLEASE ORIENT THE GARAGE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

2. PLEASE SIZE THE WATER METER. SEE U.P.C. TABLE 6-4.

FOUNDATION PLANS:

1. PLEASE PROVIDE A FOOTING FOR THE MECHANICAL SCREEN WALLS.

FLOOR PLANS:

1. HOW DOES THE FIXED GLASS IN THE MASTER BEDROOM COMPLY WITH R303 EXCEPTION 1?

2. HOW DOES THE HEARTH EXTENSION TO THE NORTH OF THE FIREPLACE'S FIREBOX COMPLY WITH TABLE R1002.1 ITEM B?

3. IDENTIFY CEILING HEIGHTS IN ALL AREAS ON FLOOR PLAN OR FRAMING PLAN. I COULDN'T FIND SOME LEDGER HEIGHTS.

4. APPLIANCES INSTALLED IN GARAGES SHALL BE MOUNTED ON PLATFORMS AT LEAST 18" ABOVE THE
FLOOR, PER M1307.3 . IDENTIFY THE THING (REFRIGERATOR?) ADJACENT TO DOOR 17.

STRUCTURAL PLANS:

1. ALTERNATE BWP NOTE 5 / S-3 ; THE PAHD42s AREN'T RATED AT 1800# UNTILL THEY ARE 8" FROM THE EDGE OF AN OUTSIDE CORNER.SEE R602.10.6 AND SIMPSON. ……..HPAHD22?

2. CLARIFY "REBUILD REMODLED SPACE' WALLS WHERE NECESSARY" AT THE BOTTOM OF PAGE S-3.

2. PLEASE SPECIFY MANUFACTURER AND SERIES OF THE LVL OVER THE MASTER BEDROOM AND CLOSET.
I CAN'T FIND A 5.125" WIDE LVL. IS THIS A GLUE LAM?




4. ROOF FRAMING / S-4 ; JUSTIFY THE 3 X 10 VALLEY RAFTER.

5. CLARIFY THE "B-7" SPANNING 10' OVER THE MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET. IF IT'S A 6 X 10 #1D.F., PLEASE JUSTIFY.

6. PROVIDE HEADERS FOR THE OPTIONAL CLEARSTORY WINDOWS AS SEEN IN THE NORTH ELEVATION.

SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES:

1. PLEASE SPEC A GYP. BOARD FOR THE CEILINGS FRAMED @ 24" O.C. AND NOTE WHERE APPROPRIATE. SEE TABLE R702.3.5 FOOTNOTE D.

2. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL.

3. PLEASE REFERENCE TABLE R702.1(1) IN DETAIL TW / S-5 TO CLARIFY THE MEASUREMENT OF THE 5/8" 3 COAT STUCCO.

4. TW / S-5 ; THE 3/8" SHEATHING APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE ½" SHEATHING MENTIONED ELSEWHERE.

5. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCUPPER DETAIL AND SIZE.

6. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE FIREPLACE.

PLUMBING PLANS:

1. PLUMBING NOTE 7-2 / P-1 ; PLEASE RECONSIDER THE SIZE OF THE GATE VALVE.

2. PLUMBING NOTE 7-3 / P-1 ; PLEASE INVESTIGATE THE NAME OF THE WATER COMPANY.

MECHANICAL PLANS:

1. THE SUPPLY DUCTS APPEAR TO BE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY M1603.

ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. A RECEPTACLE OUTLET SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE BASIN IN EACH BATHROOM, PER E3801.6.
BATHROOM OUTLETS SHALL BE ON A SEPARATE 20 AMP CIRCUIT WITH NO OTHER OUTLETS, PER E33603.4.
SEE THE SOUTH LAVATORY IN THEHALL BATH ROOM.

2. WHERE CEILING FANS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, PROVIDE A NOTE INDICATING ONLY APPROVED
OUTLET BOXES SHALL BE USED, PER E4001.6.


IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER:
DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/19/2004 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/19/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed