Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM02055
Parcel: 11307160A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04CM02055
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/25/2004 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
05/26/2004 Patricia Gilbert ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: May 26th, 2004
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM02055
PROJECT NAME: Four-plex Addition
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1509 East Hedrick Drive
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT APPLICATION, HYDROLOGY REPORT

1. Include a note on the plan that the entire site is in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Zone AE. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15

2. Show the 100-year peak water surface elevation (WSEL) on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15.

3. A floodplain use permit is required for any work/construction within a floodplain. Submit a floodplain permit application and a hydrology report (see comment below) with the second submittal.

4. A hydrology report is required for developments which are impacted by flows from significant watercourses affected by flows with 100 cfs or more (i.e. floodplain). The objective of a hydrology report is to establish finish floor elevations which assure that all structures are free from flooding during a regulatory event (100 cfs or more). Encroachment is required to be addressed in the hydrology report. Development within the floodway fringe can not increase the water surface elevation more than a tenth of a foot. A licensed civil engineer with the state of Arizona is required to write a hydrology report. Submit a hydrology report with the second submittal. Tucson Code Chapter 26-5., SMDDFM 2.3.

5. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-08.4.1.E

6. Include bearings on the site plan. 2-02.2.1.A.5.

7. Identify and label the SVT's on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10.

8. If applicable, identify the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13.

9. Include drainage patterns on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

10. Show finish grades and spot elevations for the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

11. It is noted that a finish floor elevation (FFE) is shown on the new structure. Because the hydrology report has not been submitted it is not clear what the finish floor elevation is supposed to be. The finish floor elevation must meet the minimal requirement of being set one foot above the water surface elevation. Submit the Hydrology Report with the next submittal and set the finish floor elevation according to the hydrology report. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

12. There is a general note stating that cut and fill quantities are less than 50 cubic yards. The probability of the new structure needing to be elevated is high if effort to meet the minimal requirement of the FFE being one foot above the water surface elevation. Revise the cut and fill quantities based on the correct FFE from the hydrology report submitted during the second submittal. 50 cubic yards or more of cut and/or fill requires a grading permit and a grading plan. If the cut and fill quantities are 50 cubic yards or more submit a grading application (green card) and a grading plan with the second site plan submittal. DS 2-02.2.1.A17.

13. If applicable identify all easements of record on the plan with recording docket a page reference. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20.

14. Dimension from the street centerline to the sidewalk. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21.

15. Indicate if the street is Public or a Private Street? Identify if the ROW is future or existing. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18

16. Align driveway access to existing driveway across the street, close any unused driveways and show adjacent driveways.

17. After researching the TDOT map site the contours on the site plan do not match up to what is found on the TDOT map site. It appears that there is a three foot difference between what is on the TDOT map site and the site plan. Please revise and add existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number and show the datum being used on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23.

18. It is noted that a benchmark has been shown on the plan. However it is not clear what "I - 660 sheet 8" means. Show on the plan the correct City Field Book and page number. Refer to comment 17. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23.

19. When showing spot elevations include elevations for the proposed sidewalk and PAAL. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23.

20. Where is the solid waste trash container and enclosure? New development will provide on-site refuse storage, collection, and pickup areas with service access from within the tract or from an alley adjacent to the tract. Revise the plan to show the solid waste trash container and enclosure. For the requirements for solid waste bins and enclosures refer to DS 6-01.

21. For clarity show the utilities at a lighter line weight than what is indicated on the plan.

22. Because the hydrology report and a grading plan have not been submitted for the first review, additional comments could be forthcoming with the second submittal.
06/24/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0
06/24/2004 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Include the proper and common name of existing vegetation to remain in place DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e

2. 20% of shrubs in landscape border are required to be 5 gallon size DS 2-06.3.5.F

3. One additional tree is required in the interior landscape border along southwest property line per LUC Table 3.7.2-I

4. Provide a 5' continuous screen along Hedrick St. per LUC Table 3.7.2-1

5. A 5' wall is required to screen parking lot from adjacent residential properties to east and west per LUC 3.7.2-I

6. All walls are required to be of masonry material or masonry with stucco or textured finish. LUC 3.7.3.7.A.1

7. Show on site and landscape plans the location of the refuse storage per DS 6.01.2.1.A

8. A 6' screen for refuse storage is required for adjacent properties LUC Table 3.7.2-I

9. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation.

10. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0
06/28/2004 Daniel Castro ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were
addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD)

1. Dimensions provided from west lot line to east lot line in the northern portion of the project exceed the width of the lot. Re-check dimensions and revise as required. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5)

2. Remove all pencil marks from drawing.

3. Under the vehicle parking calculation, indicate by note the number of bedrooms in each unit. This information is required to verify the total number parking spaces required. (LUC 3.3.4) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4)

4. Revise the note under the parking calculation which states the parking is per "Storage Use Group" to "Multi-family Dwellings".

5. Provide a back-up spur at the end of the row of parking south of the new 4-plex. A minimum of three (3) feet is required between the back of spur and the existing fence. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.D) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11)

6. Under the Zoning Information block, revise the side setback requirement to "10' or ¾ height of the exterior building wall, whichever is greater".

7. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20)

8. Add a note which states the land use classification, development designator, and "subject to" section for the proposed use. Refer to LUC 2.3.5.2.A. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31)

9. Revise the lot coverage calculation to include the vehicular use area. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3)

10. Provide the building area expansion calculation. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6)


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
06/29/2004 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/30/2004 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/30/2004 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed