Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Permit Number - T04CM01137
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2004 | Terry Stevens | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T04CM01137 06/22/04 PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 2. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. SITE PLAN: 1. TWO SITE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. CLARIFY WHICH WILL BE USED. 2. RETAINING WALL INDICTED ON SITE PLAN "#2" REQUIRES A DESIGN. IT IS IN EXCESS OF 4' FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING, RETAINING MORE THAN 3', AND HAS SURCHARGE LOADS FROM THE STRUCTURE. FOUNDATION PLANS: 1. NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE FOOTINGS, OR STATE THAT THE ASSUMED VALUE OF 1500 PSF IS BEING USED, PER TABLE R401.4.1, A SOILS REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED. IT IS UP TO THE DESIGNER/HOMEBUILDER TO BE AWARE OF THE SOIL AND CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. IF SOIL TESTING HAS BEEN DONE, A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND THE FOUNDATION DESIGN SHALL REFLECT THE SOILS REPORTS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. LOCATE AND DETAIL STEP FOOTING FROM RESTRAINING WALL TO STANDARD FOOTING. 3. LOCATE AND DETAIL ALL FOOTINGS FOR THE FOLLOWING: - POSTS---------MISSING FOR 6X6 POST AT FAMILY ROOM/HALLWAY FLOOR PLANS: 1. WINDOW "B" IN SEVERAL AREAS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CORRECT: FAMILY ROOM AT DOOR, MASTER BEDROOM, BREAKFAST ROOM. 2. GENERAL NOTES APPEAR TO BE FOR A FRAMED BLDG.------CLARIFY. 3. FIREPLACES: - INDICATE FIREPLACE HEARTH SIZE, LOCATION AND MATERIALS 4. APPLIANCES INSTALLED IN GARAGES SHALL BE MOUNTED ON PLATFORMS AT LEAST 18" ABOVE THE FLOOR, PER M1307.3 STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. PROVIDE DETAIL OF HOW DOUBLE I-JOISTS ARE CONNECTED TOGETHER----SIZE AND TYPE OF FILLER AND NAILING PATTERN-----AS WELL AS TYPE OF HANGER FOR I-JOISTS CONNECTING TO DOUBLE I-JOIST 2. BLOCKING AND PAT STRAPS ON DETAIL 10/8 IS NOT CORRECT-------SEE DETAIL 11/S1.1-------INDICATE LOCATION OF BLOCKING OF BAYS ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN 3. PROVIDE OPENING WIDTHS AT BEARING WALLS AT DINING ROOM 4. VEGA AT FOYER/FAMILY ROOM HAS A FOOTING BUT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE BEARING ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. PROVIDE CONNECTION DETAIL IF BEARING. 5. DETAIL 19/8 INDICATES BEARING LEDGERS ON BOTH SIDES OF CHIMNEY. FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLAN DO NOT REFLECT THIS CONDITION. CLARIFY. 6. CALL OUT ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN CONNECTION OF BEAMS TO MASONRY WALL--------SEE DETAIL 7/S1.1. 7. REMOVE STANDARD LINTEL SCHEDULE AND REFERENCE INTEGRA PLANS FOR LINTEL SIZING. 8. INDICATE SIZE OF RIDGE RAFTER FOR 2X6 FRAMING AT FRONT PORCH. 9. CLEARLY INDICATE LOCATION OF ALL REQUIRED 36"GUARD RAILS FOR ROOF DECK. [ON ELEVATIONS ALSO] HEIGHT OF BLDG. MAY CHANGE PLUMBING PLANS: 1. A 1" WATER METER IS REQUIRED--------CLEARLY INDICATE ON PLANS 2. PROVIDE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE RELIEF VALVE AT WATER HEATER. MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. SUPPLY AND RETURN AIR DUCTS ARE UNDERSIZED -----SEE IRC2000-- M1602.2 ---M1603.1 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: TERRY STEVENS @ 791-5550 EXT. 1112 |
| 06/17/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Two copies of a grading plan must submitted with a completed grading permit application for review and approval prior to building permit approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/24/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |