Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T04CM00964
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2004 | Robert Sherry | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the water supply pipe sizing to agree with the submitted calculations. Section 610.4, UPC 1994. Reference Sections 610.4 and 610.12 (or 610.13), UPC 1994. 2. Revise natural gas pipe sizing to agree with Table 12-3, UPC 1994, as stated in keynote #4/P2.1. |
| 04/15/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/29/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet E0.0 1. "Conduit 18, since it parallels (2) 3/0, would be read as "Greater than 3/0" on Table 250-66. Size of Gnd should be #2, not #3. Note that each Gnd shall be sized for the TOTAL cross-sectional area of the paralleled conductors." This comment was made on the previous submittal. The response to this Comment has been duly noted. However, this conductor in question is not an Equipment Grounding Conductor, but rather a bonding jumper, such that the applicable Code section is 250-104 (a) (4), which refers us to Table 250-66. And Footnote 1 of Table 250-66 confirms that "This table also applies to the derived conductors of separately derived ac systems." Sheet E0.1 1. "Provide a mounting detail for the 112.5 KVA X'FMR, including dimensions and total weight of the equipment, attachment, and any other information required by the Building Plans Examiner." This comment was made on the previous submittal. The response to this Comment has been duly noted. This is a typical requirement which was to my knowledge was never waived in the past due to uncertainties of procurement. In any case, Raul Palma (x1109), your Building/Structural Plans Examiner, needs to approve any such special arrangement as you suggest. The Electrical Plans Examiner will be evaluating such detail in context of its installation in the equipment room for compliance with NEC 110-26. 2. "Panel schedules refer to One-Line Diagram for fault current rating. One-Line does not indicate this for Panels M1, P1, or H1." This comment was made on the previous submittal. The response to this Comment has been duly noted. However, it is still necessary to specify the fault current ratings of your panels, either on the panel schedules or on the line diagram. Just providing the available fault current at these panels, although necessary, does not fulfill the requirement of specifying such rating of the panels. |
| 05/10/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Engineering calc`s are required for shelving or racks over 8 feet high. a. Show all connection details and structural members. 5/10/04 1) Comply to the comment by Linda Buczynski regarding the equipement loads on roof. Provide structural calculations to verify that existing structural supports can support the new roof equipement. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2004 | JEGAN | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/10/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |