Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM00843
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2004 | Patricia Gilbert | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 5th, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM00843 PROJECT NAME: Lecocq Apartments PROJECT ADDRESS: 3118 East Blacklidge Blvd. PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-08.4.1.E 2. The spot elevations on the site and drainage plans are not consistent. There is 0.5 foot difference between the two plans. The spot elevations at the southwest and northeast corner are not consistent. Revise the plans for accuracy and consistency. 3. The existing drainage for the site flows out to Blacklidge Drive and to the northeast corner of the site. The proposed drainage is directing flow to the adjacent east and west neighbors. Stormwater must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under natural or existing conditions. The proposed drainage does not meet this criteria. Include a drainage statement from an Arizona Registered Civil Engineer addressing offsite to onsite flows and onsite to offsite flows. Revise the plan and submit a drainage statement. SMDDFM 12.5 4. Dimension from street centerline to the existing curb and the proposed sidewalk. DS 2-02.2.1.A21. 5. The collection vehicle can not get to the trash enclosure at the proposed location. Each service area is required to have a clear approach of fourteen (14) feet by forty (40) feet for the collection vehicle. The maximum back-up distance for the collection vehicle shall be forty (40) feet. The proposed location would require the vehicle to back up into the street across traffic, this is unacceptable. The current proposal does not meet code and the current location must be relocated. Please contact John Clark from Environmental Services, 791-3175 ext. 1136, for assistance on solutions for a location. When a site does not meet the Development Standards, a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) process needs to occur. For assistance with a DSMR please contact Marilyn Kalthoff 791-5550 extension 1117. 6. Include bearings on the site plan. 2-02.2.1.A.5. 7. Fill quantities are incorrect. Comparing the existing grades and the proposed finish floor elevations (FFE), the fill quantities will be in the hundreds. A grading permit will be required. Submit a grading permit application with the next site plan submittal and correct the fill quantities. 8. Show roof drainage. DS 2-02.2.1A. 9. On the left side of the site plan there is some verbiage regarding sanitation, which is inconsistent with the proposed solid waste dumpster enclosure. Remove the verbiage or revise the solid waste proposal for consistency. |
| 03/11/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/22/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A 6' wall is required for the refuse enclosure per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2) 5' continuous screen is required for vehicle use area along Blacklidge Dr. 3) Screens may be located in the landscape border if the criteria indicated in Luc 3.7.3.2 are met. 4) Revise symbols to clarify individual plants in landscape border along Blacklidge Dr. per DS 2-07.2.2 5) The NPP plan summary of calculations does not match landscape plan. Celtis reticulata mitigation should be a total of 2 trees. 6) Locate plants on aerial photograph. DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 7) A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential properties, excluding buildings per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 8) A twenty-five (25) foot minimum height clearance, free of any overhead obstructions (wires, branches, etc.), shall be provided above the refuse collection site. 9) Provide Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. 10) Refuse containers are to be placed so that the collection vehicle does not have to back into moving traffic, on or off the premises. 11) The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B |
| 03/24/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The NPP plan summary of calculations does not match landscape plan. Celtis reticulata mitigation should be a total of 2 trees. 2) Locate plants on aerial photograph. DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 |
| 03/26/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Integrated Design and Construction 6401 N. Camino Katrina Tucson, AZ 85718 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM00843 Lycocq Apartments 3118 E. Blacklidge Drive TRANSMITTAL: March 29, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project is being reviewed for full code compliance. 2. Revise the address in the title block to read Blacklidge Drive, rather than Boulevard. DS 2-02.2.1.A.3 3. Provide the width of the standard parking spaces on the drawing and the width of the h/c parking space on the detail. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 4. To adjacent C-1 zoned property to the west the required perimeter yard building setback is the height of the exterior building wall. Provide a bldg setback dimension from the west property line to building "A" to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. Based on a 12'-2" foot building height the setback to adjacent C-1 zoned property must be a minimum of 12'-2". LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 5. Add a general site plan note stating that the residential development in the R-2 zone is subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F. LUC 2.3.5.2.A.2 6. Label the minimum one-foot setback between the PAAL and the carport roof overhangs. DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 7. Label centerline and add dimensions to curb and sidewalk along Blacklidge Drive. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 & .21 8. Due to overstrike of the number "1" with the south property line, the 10'-0" setback appears to read "0'-0". Please revise. 9. If free-standing outdoor lighting is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 10. The location, type, size and height of any proposed free-standing signage must be shown. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 11. Check and revise the math in the lot coverage calculation to be correct. It appears that the area of the storage buildings has been inadvertently omitted from the sum total lot coverage. DS 2-02.2.2.A.3 LUC 3.2.9 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. PSMc: H:\PETER\Siteplans\T04CM00843a |
| 03/29/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/19/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/29/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |