Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - T04CM00675
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Jim Fields PO Box 556 Sonoita, AZ 85637 Dave Parquette 4070 E. 29th Street Tucson, AZ (520) 748-9707 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM00675 A-Access Self Storage 4070 E. 29th Street Site Plan Review (revisions) TRANSMITTAL: February 4, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. It is unclear on the site plan exactly which portion(s) of the lot is to be used for vehicle storage. Note 7 indicates the existing/proposed use on the southern portion of the lot (to the south of the 6-foot chain link fence) "is to be used for vehicle storage within the lot". For clarity label the 6-foot chain link fence on the site plan sheet A-10. If some sections of this southern portion are not to be paved for use as vehicle storage they must be barricaded off and labeled as being not part of the vehicle storage use area. Label and state the type and height of barricades on the plan. If the existing easement to the cell tower is to be used for access to the vehicle storage areas it must also be paved and included as part of the vehicle use calculation. Dimension the width of this easement on the drawing. It is also unclear on the plan drawing if the portion labeled "North Area" is proposed to be paved. Revise plan as necessary. Further comments may be necessary once plan is revised. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 2. The math in the coverage calculation is incorrect. 75,987 square feet times 24% is 18,237 square feet. 3. Remove all references to "Lot A" and "Lot B" as this implies that a lot split is being proposed for the site. 4. It is unclear on the plan how access to the south portion of the site is to be gained as no gates or other openings are shown on the plan. Clarify and revise. ANS/IBC If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 02/04/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/10/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 10, 2005 TO: Dave Paquette SUBJECT: A-Access Self Storage, Site Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM00675-R SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Site Plan was not approved at this time. Revise the Site Plan to address the following comments. Site Plan comments: 1. Provide a drainage report accounting for change in impervious area and retention detention requirements. Since no previously approved site plan shows chip seal or other impervious surfacing in the Lot B area, the analysis must be based on pre-development conditions. 2. Revise the site plan to provide retention and/or detention as specified in the drainage report. Five-year threshhold retention is required. Detention is required unless the drainage report demonstrates that there will be no adverse impacts on adjacent properties from this project. 3. Show existing contours and proposed grades for the site. 4. Show drainage patterns for the whole site. If the south portion of the lot drains across the north portion of the site, demonstrate that the 5. A complete grading permit application is required for this project. The application must include a copy of the drainage report and three copies of the grading plan and three copies of the stormwater pollution prevention plan. 6. Provide details or full descriptions of the proposed new barricades. Revise the Site Plan to address all of these comments. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 02/14/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the location of individual plant(s) within landscape border to the southeast along Irving Rd. use a different symbol for each type of plant material e.g. (screening or ground cover) per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.a 2. Provide protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls for areas where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular or pedestrian traffic per LUC 3.7.2.3.B |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2005 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/16/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |