Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM00658
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/19/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise Specification section 2.04A; corrosion protection for underground gas pipe shall be factory applied, not field wrapped. Reference Section 1211.7, UPC 1994. 2. Include all fixtures and water outlets (e.g. sterilizers) when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994. 3. Provide calculations showing water supply piping is sized in accordance with Section 610.1, UPC 1994. 4. Provide cleanouts as required by Section 707.4, UPC 1994, as amended by the State of Arizona. 5. Relocate the reduced pressure backflow preventers in room 323 to conform to the access and clearance requirements of Section 603.2.3, UPC 1994. 6. Each piece of equipment requiring backflow protection (e.g. sterilizer) shall be separately protected. Reference Section 603.0, UPC 1994. |
| 02/19/2004 | Robert Sherry | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide fire dampers at duct penetrations of south wall of room 320. Reference Section 607.5, IMC 2000. 2. Provide ventilation calculations for the southeast area of the third floor with new HVAC work. Reference Section 401.2, IMC 2000. 3. Show the required pitch for the steam piping and the location of any intermediate steam traps (and associated condensate piping) on the plans. Reference Section 1206.8, IMC 2000. 4. Complete detail 5/M6.2 and note applicable location. Reference Section 1206.9, IMC 2000. 5. Provide detail showing how the hydronic and other piping is to be supported from the structure. |
| 02/19/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/09/2004 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet E0.2 1. Secondaries on transformers 3N-T2, 3E-T3, and 3E-T2 shall be sized per NEC Table 250-66, according to Footnote 1 on that table. Thus, the #10 GND for 3N-T2 and 3E-T3 need to be changed to #8, and the #6 GND for 3E-T2 needs to be changed to #2. 2. It appears that panels such as 3N-DP-A and 3E-CR-G are covered by NEC 517-14, Panelboard Bonding. Provide such bonding as required for all such panels, or justify otherwise. Willing to discuss. 3. Keynote #1 apparently needs to read "200A/3P" instead of "100A/3P", as it feeds a panel with 112A, and the phase conductor and ground are sized for 200A. Sheet E0.3 1. Please note that on Panel 4E-CR-3, Sub-Panel 3E-CR-A is not fed via a transformer. Sheet E2.0 1. Per NEC 620-23, a separate branch circuit shall supply the machine room lighting and receptacle. Per NEC 620-24, a separate branch circuit shall supply the hoistway pit lighting and receptacle. Please separate the loads on Circuit 1N-DP-37-21 into a single circuit serving the machine room loads, and the other serving the pit. Sheet E2.1 1. Please include the following note: "All work in patient care areas shall comply with the requirements of NEC 517-13. Sheet E4.0 1. Apparently the title needs to be changed from "Lighting Plan" to "Fire Alarm". |
| 03/09/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 3/9/2004 The building plans may not be reviewed and approved until a site plan which shows sufficient parking, FAR calculations, building heights and setbacks has been approved and included in the submittal package. |
| 03/12/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Show all exit signs on architectural floor plans. 2) Sheet A2.2 of plans detail (1) shows 2x blocking. Specify fire retardant pressure treated. 3) Section © of detail A2.3 at junction of new structure and existing, how is this area sealed from smoke penetration? Clarify! 4) Details 1 and 2 of A3.1 shows bubbling around the beams and trusses, is this fire retardant spray? 5) Roof framing plan- the designations on the framing members and those shown on the calc`s are different, ie., plans show 28k 273/130 and calc`s show 30k7. Clarify! 6) Calc`s show a beam W14x99 where is this beam shown on plans? 7) Provide engineering calc`s for the beam W24x55 shown on third floor framing plan. Sheet (S3) 8) Clarify the frame and member designations. Calc`s show 0 Frame and 1 Fame different column members show the same numbers(designation), the situation occurs with beams at different frame sections. Also, these members with the same designation have different shear values. Ex. Sheet 215 of calc`s column #4 V=5.82k and on sheet 233 another column designated as column #4 the V=16.70k. It is confusing as to which column or beam is being referred to. Clarify! 9) Is there any medical gases? If so show there location. Also special inspection is required. |
| 03/15/2004 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/25/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |