Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T04CM00399
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/20/2004 | EROSE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 02/20/2004 | EROSE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 02/20/2004 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review covers Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL: q There are no general comments to be addressed. ARCHITECTURAL: q There are no architectural comments to be addressed. STRUCTURAL: q On Sheet S1.1 under the heading "Loading", please correct the wind and seismic references to reflect the 2000 International Building Code (IBC). q Provide on Sheet S1.1 along with the general notes the requirement for special inspection per Chapter 17 of the 2000 International Building Code. Specifically note all materials and work requiring special inspection under Chapter 17 [2000 IBC Sec. 1704.1.1]. q Provide a note within the general structural notes on Sheet S1.1 regarding deferred submittals for pre-fabricated trusses [2000 IBC Sec. 106.3.4.2]. Truss calculations must be signed, dated and wet-sealed by an engineer who is registered in Arizona. A layout drawing shall be provided with the truss calculations showing their placement. Also, the Engineer of Record shall review and indicate on the truss drawings that they have been found to be in conformance with the design of the building. Once the Engineer of Record has reviewed and accepted the truss drawings they must be reviewed and approved by the Building Official prior to their installation. q Detail 2 on Sheet ESP-1 refers to the structural drawings for the footing design for the light pole bases. The structural drawings do not provide any information regarding this footing. Please coordinate these details. Also, provide a structural calculation to justify the design of this footing. q The east wall elevation on Sheet S3.1 indicates on either side of the entrance a 5'-4" (66") pilaster. This corresponds with Page 31 (and Page 17) of the calculations. The foundation plan on Sheet S2.1 and the east wall elevation on Sheet S3.1 both have keyed Detail 6 on Sheet S5.2 as the applicable detail. Detail 6 on Sheet S5.2 shows a 4'-8" (56") wide masonry pilaster. Please correct. There do not appear to be any 4'-8" pilasters anywhere in the project. MECHANICAL: q There are no mechanical comments to be addressed. PLUMBING: q There are no plumbing comments to be addressed. ELECTRICAL: q All of the exterior metal halide light fixtures that contain lamps over 50 watts need to be fully shielded (so that no light rays are emitted by the fixture at angles above the horizontal plane) [1993 Outdoor Lighting Code, Table 5]. The luminaire schedule on Sheet E2.0 does not make it clear that all of these fixtures are "fully shielded". Please clarify on the plans. -End of Review- |
| 02/20/2004 | ELAINE ROSE | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 02/20/2004 | EROSE1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 02/20/2004 | EROSE1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/20/2004 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |