Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM00397
Parcel: 14011020B

Address:
2520 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04CM00397
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/12/2004 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/26/2004 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Site review - 2520 E. Benson Highway
DATE: 26 March 2004
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM00397
T15S, R14E, Section 5

SUMMARY:

Engineering Division has reviewed the Site Plan received on 10 March 2004. This site lies within a designated critical basin. Resubmittal shall include a drainage report addressing critical basin flow reduction requirements (15% minimum reductions in the post-developed 2- 10- and 100-year flow events exiting the site), in accordance with Sections 1.4 and 2.1 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (Development Standards 10-01.0 and 2-02.2 C). The report must also address the minimum contents outlined in section 2.3 of the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) - Development Standard 10-02.0. Approval of the site plan is not recommended, and may not be, until a drainage report addressing the requirements noted above is approved and the items required for site approval are provided on the plan. Subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, in order to assure incorporation of retention/detention, and possible floodplain development requirements onsite.

Please address the following comments on the site plan:
1. Depict existing and future sight visibility triangles for the Driveway/Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) intersecting Benson Highway - a major (Arterial) street - in accordance with Development Standards (DS) 2-02.2.10 & 3-01.5.0 and the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan (see redlines on plan).
2. Depict drainage patterns, lowest floor elevation, and proposed finish grades. The elevations provided do not coincide with current elevations/topography available online. For information, visit: http://tdotmaps.transview.org/mapguide_mwf_tdot.htm
3. Provide and label roof drainage direction(s), downspout locations and corresponding sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of drainage under all sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E and 2-08.5.1 E).
4. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1 A 17).
5. Dimension the existing and future half, or full right of way widths for Benson Highway. Please ensure future intersection widening in accordance with the MS&R Plan is depicted for the MS&R right of way (DS 2-02.2 A 19 & MS&R Plan).
6. All easements of record must be depicted with recording information on the plan (DS 2-02.2 A 20).
7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, and utility lines. Include the existing sewer line on, or adjacent to, the southwestern portion of the site (DS 2-02.2.1 A 21).
8. Depict and label the location of major physical features, such the adjacent drainageway (Earp Wash), on the site plan (DS 2-02.2 A 22). Please refer to comment # 10, below. Drainage and maintenance access easements may be required to be dedicated prior to site approval.
9. The plan must depict a dumpster location with an enclosure onsite, or provide written approval from Environmental Services Department for an acceptable alternative. All commercial site developments require an onsite centralized refuse provision with container location, size and access thereto fully labeled and dimensioned on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1 A 32 an 6-01.0).
10. Additional required information, some drawn from a drainage report, must also be provided on a revised site plan. These include, but are not limited to the following:
a) limits of the 100-year floodplain with water surface elevations at 200' intervals, minimum;
b) 100-year ponding limits/water surface elevation for onsite detention;
c) detention basin maintenance access ramp, a maintenance checklist, and basin responsibility information;
d) erosion hazard setback for Earp Wash;
e) 50' Watercourse Amenities and Safety Habitat (W.A.S.H.) Ordinance Study Area delineation. Please refer to Section 29-12, Tucson Code, for W.A.S.H. Ordinance development requirements. These regulations, and related attachments A-F may be purchased at the City/County Public Works Building on the 3rd floor (Floodplain/City Engineer's Office), or accessed by the following link: http://fws.municode.com/CGI-BIN/om_isapi.dll?infobase=11294.nfo&jump=ch029.x1-29-12&softpage=newTestMainnonFrame#JUMPDEST_ch029.x1-29-12
11. A grading permit may be required for this development. Grading must be in conformance with the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) - local amendment. This document may be accessed at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/2000_IBC_Amendments.pdf

GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, due to drainage requirements associated with this proposed development.
2. A right of way excavation permit will be required for all proposed work or development activity in the right of way. Contact Permit and Codes Section, Tucson Department of Transportation - Engineering Division at 791-5100 for questions.
Resubmittal will require a revised site plan with a drainage report addressing all of the items listed above.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/06/2004 Andrew Connor NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0
04/06/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) A 30" continuous screen is required along abandon section of Benson Hwy per LUC 3.7.2-I

2) Identify on landscape plan by genus and species the tree to remain per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e

3) Indicate on landscape and site plans the height of existing CMU wall per DS 2-07.2.2.A.3.b

4) Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0

5) Show on landscape plan DG for existing non-paved dirt areas up to abandon section of Benson Hwy, including any non-paved areas per LUC 3.7.2.7
04/09/2004 Patricia Gehlen ZONING REVIEW Denied CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ZONING REVIEW SECTION

DATE: April 10, 2004
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM00397
PROJECT NAME: New Storage Warehouse
PROJECT ADDRESS:2520 East Benson Highway
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gehlen

The following items must be revised on or added to the site plan. Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed:

1) Revise the proposed land use to "Storage Use Group: Personal Storage "31" in both the Code Review and Misc. Notes sections of sheet G1.0. In addition, add the existing use of the site and the LUC "subject to's" ( LUC 3.5.10.3.C and F) to the Code Review. The LUC "subject to's" must include the verbiage found in the text (DS 2-02.2.1.A.31),
2) Revise the north setback to read "the greater of 21 feet or the (H) if the structure from back of future curb (DS 2-02.2.1.A.7),
3) Add SVT's as shown on Engineering redlines (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10),
4) Dimension the ingress/egress location and the PAAL along the south side of the proposed building (DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 & 12),
5) If free standing signage and/or outdoor light is proposed, please detail on site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 & 25),
6) Add a note under the Parking Requirements on sheet G1.0 which states no loading zones are required due to direct vehicle access (DS 2-02.2.A.5),
7) If applicable, show the location, width, type, and recordation information for all existing and proposed easements on site (DS 2-02.2.1.A.20),
8) Revise the percent developed calculation under the Code Review to read "Floor Area Ratio" and exclude the vehicle use area from the calculation (DS 2-02.2.2.A.2, LUC 3.2.11).
04/10/2004 PATRICIA GEHLEN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/12/2004 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed