Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T04CM00332
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/26/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/26/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 06/10/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS . 1) Provide a roof diaphragm analysis and design. 2) Show how the lateral load is being resisted in the N-S direction (front elevation) glazed side. 3) On the floor plan show all partitions along with dimensions.(Partitions shown on plans are not legible.) |
| 06/18/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Please provide a cut sheet for Lighting Fixture L. 2. Provide full design for site lighting on scaled drawing, including location of each pole/luminaire, identification of fixture type and quantity on each pole, and location of conduit runs. 3. Same as above for high-rise signs and receptacle. 4. Provide pole and foundation details for all poles. For any such poles which may exceed 20' in height, such details, along with structural calculations, shall be sealed by a Structural Engineer and submitted to the Building/Structural Plans Examiner. 5. It appears that Ckts A-21 and A-25 are mixed up. There is a conflict between the Panel Schedule and the Power Floor Plan. 6. The City of Tucson will not allow an overhead service, per Section 8 of the following: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Building_Codes/1997_Administrative_Amendments.pdf, unless the existing is already overhead. Please determine the configuration of the existing service. If it is underground, remove all references to overhead service. 7. Please provide overload protection for the RTUs per NEC 430 Part III, or justify otherwise. 8. With feed-through lugs on Panel P for Panel A, it is unclear how Panel A is to be disconnected at the Service per NEC 230.70. Please clarify this, and re-evaluate the presence and sizing of the #2 G in Feeder A. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |