Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM00260
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/25/2004 | Peter McLaughlin | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Metro Permit Express 1001 N. Alvernon Way #105 Tucson, AZ 85711 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM00260 Randall Blvd. Apartments 5720 S. Randall Blvd TRANSMITTAL: February 27, 2004 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project is being reviewed for full code compliance. 2. The required and provided setbacks in the building setbacks table do not line up correctly with the front/west/north/south list. Please revise. 3. Revise the square footage and acreage to be consistent. If the site area is 58,101 square feet, as stated on the plan, the correct acreage is 1.33. Also, to show that maximum allowed density is not being exceeded, revise density calculation to show the correct acreage. LUC 3.2.10 LUC 3.2.3.1.C 4. Label and dimension any existing or proposed easements and add their recordation information to the site plan DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 5. If free-standing outdoor lighting is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 6. The location, type, size and height of any proposed free-standing signage must be shown. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 7. Label the centerline for Randall Blvd. and dimension its ½ right-of way. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 & .21 8. Provide site visibility triangles adjacent to the access point to Randall Blvd. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 9. Add the maximum slope of the handicap access aisles. ANS/ IBC 10. The location map on the site plan (sheet 2.0) shows this property to be located on Jeanette Blvd. but the actual address is on Randall Blvd. Revise the location map to show the property correctly. DS 2-02.2.1.A.4 11. This site is made up of two lots, both being a portion of recently split lots. All approved lot split documents must be provided to the zoning review section. Also, the two lots must be combined prior to site plan approval. Provide lot combination documents including Assessor's lot combo docs and notarized/recorded covenant. 12. The Site Plan and Grading Plan refer to the project as Randall Blvd. Apartments while the Landscape / NPPO plans use the titles of Drexel & Randall and Drexel & Randall Apartments. Revise the name of the project to be the same on all sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 02/27/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments |
| 02/27/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A 5' wall along property line is required to screen adjacent residential lots on north and south sides of property, clarify on site and landscape plan per LUC 3.7.2-I. 2) A 5' continuos screen is required along south Randall per LUC 3.7.2-I 3) Indicate on landscape plan size, type and material of all screen walls per DS 2-07.2.2.3.d 4) Indicate the SVT's on Randall Blvd. 5) Space tress equally along interior landscape border on south side of property, acceptable placement is one tree for every 33ft. segment. LUC 3.7.2.4.B.3.a 6) Revise landscape plan to reflect placement of mitigated and transplanted Acacia constricta's 7) Submit irrigation system specifications, design, and layout Per DS 2-06.5.4.A and 2-06.5.4.B. 8) NPPO calculation does not match, plan indicates 2-Cecidium floridum, calculation shows-1 revise as needed. 9) NPPO credit not applicable if grading plan is not modified to preserve drip-line radius. 10) Additional landscape is required throughout retention basin. |
| 03/04/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | NPPO calculation does not match, plan indicates 2-Cecidium floridum, calculation shows-1 revise as needed. NPPO credit not applicable if grading plan is not modified to preserve drip-line radius. |
| 03/04/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Site and Drainage review - 5720 S. Randall DATE: 5-8 March 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM00260/T04BU00159 T15S, R14E, Section 7 SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Drainage Report, Site, Grading and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans received on 2 February 2004. Approvals are not recommended at this time. Please address the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1. The offsite drainage area depicted and analyzed does not include the area south of Mossman Road that appears to contribute to this site. Please check this area and provide a photo-topographic map at a scale of one inch = 200 feet or larger, depicting the items described in Section 2.3.1.3 A 3 (a-d) of the City of Tucson's Standards Manual For Drainage Design and Floodplain Management - SMDDFM (Development Standard 10-02.0). 2. Revise the offsite drainage area hydrologic data sheet calculations and any subsequent analyses to reflect the area described above, in item 2 (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.3 A 6). 3. Should a revised hydrologic analysis result in determination of regulatory flow (100 cfs or greater), please insure the report addresses the major technical items listed in Section 2.3.1.4 A - G of the SMDDFM (DS 10-02.0). 4. Text in the report (page 2) states that the project is affected by offsite drainage, then states the site is NOT affected by any offsite drainage sources on page 4. Please correct/revise as appropriate, and address any existing drainage acceptance along the south property line. Include discussion of any of the hydraulic systems used to collect offsite flows, in accordance with Section 2.3.1.5 B of the SMDDFM. 5. Please include a copy of Sheets GP 1& 2 with the report (as referenced on the enclosed Site Plan - sheet 2.0), and insure all the items listed in Section 2.3.1.6 A (a - f) of the SMDDFM are included on the exhibit (DS 10-02.0). 6. Include as a part of the basin maintenance checklist, the summaries provided in Section 2.3.1.6 C 2 a & b. Please include the language in the report, as provided (DS 10-02.0). 7. Include a soils report with the resubmittal package. A soils report shall be required in conjunction with the design of each storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The report shall at a minimum address soil erodibility, soil permeability (percolation testing results), slope stability and groundwater elevations, in accordance with Section 3.5.1.3 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual (DS 10-01.0). SITE PLAN: 1. Depict sight visibility triangles for a Drive/Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) intersecting a local street, in accordance with Development Standards (DS) 2-02.2.10 & 3-01.5.0. 2. Depict, label, and provide a detail for handicapped accessibility to the onsite pedestrian path (DS 2-02.2.12 3. Dimension the half, or full right of way width for Randall Blvd (DS 2-02.2.19). 4. Please specify a minimum 5" thick concrete slab and bollards to be placed on the rear and side walls of the dumpster enclosure (DS 6-01.4.2) 5. Depict and label minimum unobstructed radii of 18' where a PAAL intersects another PAAL where used for access lanes for refuse collection onsite (DS 3-05.2.1 C 3 a). 6. Provide and label roof drainage direction(s), downspout locations and corresponding sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of drainage under all sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E and 2-08.5.1 E 7. Depict and label existing curb location on Randall Blvd. The proposed new sidewalk must be accompanied by curbing in the Randall Blvd. right of way, in accordance with Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Details (PC/COT SD) for Public Improvements. Contact Permits and Codes Section, Engineering Division - Tucson Department of Transportation at 791-5100 for right of way improvement and permitting questions. 8. Label and identify either a) new driveway aprons, b) new curb returns with curb access ramps, or c) concrete headers with 18'minimum radii, typical, at each ingress/egress location. Add a note that all construction must be in accordance with PC/COT SD for Public Improvements. GRADING PLAN: (See "greenline" mark-ups on sheets GP1 and GP 2) 1. The grading plan must indicate all revisions to the site plan that occur as a result of the drainage report, site and grading plan comments provided for this proposed site development. Please ensure the site and grading plans are consistent with one another prior to resubmittal. 2. Provide a note that grading shall be in conformance with the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) - local amendment. This document may be accessed at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/2000_IBC_Amendments.pdf 3. Depict and label grading limits on sheet GP-2. 4. Please provide copies of the grading plan with a legible Engineer's seal and license number. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: 1. Correct the text in section 10.1.4 to reflect this project operator's name and project information. 2. Provide a copy or copies of signed owner/operator certifications with the resubmittal. 3. Depict and label an appropriate washout location on sheet 1. 4. Depict and label a sediment trap or basin on sheet 1. 5. Depict and label an appropriate protected material storage area on sheet 1. For information regarding SWPPP content specifications, go to: http://www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf ***GENERAL COMMENTS*** 1. Additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, due to revisions that may need to occur in response to review comments provided. 2. A right of way excavation permit will be required for all proposed work or development activity in the right of way. Contact Permit and Codes Section, Tucson Department of Transportation - Engineering Division at 791-5100 for questions. **Resubmittal will require a revised Drainage Report, Site, Grading and Stormwater Pollution Prevention plans addressing all items listed above** If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 03/09/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire sprinklers required per 2000 IBC Sec. 903.2.8. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/11/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |