Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM00126
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2004 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Integrated Design & Construction DATE: April 5, 2004 Norman Amy 6401 N. Camino Catrina Tucson, Arizona 85718 SUBJECT: 3943 E. Montevista Drive Site plan T04CM00126 (Second Review) T13S, R14E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal. 2. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The Dumpster location is satisfactory with DSD, however permission must be obtained form Solid Waste. Contact John Clark @ 791-3175. DSD cannot approve the SP prior to the approval of Solid Waste. Please submit the approval letter from Solid Waste with the re-submittal. Per previous comment. 3. A DSMR will be required for the non-conforming dumpster location. Please contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5550 ext. 1179 for information on how to obtain a DSMR. 4. A note on the SP reads "See sheet C2 for drainage patterns", where is sheet C2? Should it T2? 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. This includes, but not limited to; the curb returns, S/W, H/C ramps and paving or any excavation, including utilities, in the public right-of-way. Per previous comment. 6. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. Please list the developer of the project also. Per previous comment. Drainage Statement: 1. A Drainage Statement is approved for SP plan purposes only. Acceptance will be done at the Grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 04/07/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1 |
| 04/07/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a revised NPP plan, no plan was included with the submittal reviewed. 2) The plan is required to show grading limits, existing topographic contours, and clear identification of trees to be preserved in place. In order to accomplish the requirements listed above the photo requires enlargement. DS 2-15.0 |
| 04/10/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSC TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM00126 Thompson Apartments 3943 E. Monte Vista Drive Site Plan Transmittal date: 2nd Review April 10, 2004 A. The previous comments were left for reference. Two copies of the LDO approval leeter and site plan and building elevations which were approved and stamped by Frank Podgorski for the Lot Development Option variance must be included with the revised set of drawings. B. The LDO case number, date of approval and conditions of approval in any is to be listed on the site plan. Please add as required. C. The issue with the dumpster location access does not appear to have been resolved. See comments by the Engineering reviewer for more information. PREVIOUS COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Stairs are allowed to encroach into the building setback a maximum of two (2) feet. The stairs cases as shown on the plan along the east and west sides of the building encroach into the interior building setback beyond the allowed maximum. A lot development option review and approval is required or the building must be redesigned to comply. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 2. There has been some discussion as to the proposed location of the dumpster. Patricia Gehlen will be holding a meeting with Engineering, Traffic and Solid Waste personnel to discuss other sites, which have been designed with the same dumpster location concept. At this time the dumpster location is still in question and may not be allowed to be placed on the site as shown. Further information will be forthcoming on this issue. Please call Patricia Gehlen for more information. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 3. Prior approvals, such as Development Review Board, Lot Development Option, Board of Adjustment, Historic District Advisory Board, and Historical Commission. List the LDO case number, date of approval and conditions of approval if any. A copy of the LDO approval letter must accompany the subsequent site plan submittal. Final approval of the site plan cannot be made the Zoning review Section until the LDO has been approved. DS 2-02.2.1.A.38 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/12/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |