Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T04CM00126
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2004 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Integrated Design & Construction Norman Amy 6401 N. Camino Catrina Tucson, Arizona 85718 SUBJECT: 3943 E. Montevista Drive Site plan T04CM00126 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with resubmittal. 2. The amount of fill is greater than 50 cubic yards, therefore Grading plan is required 3. The Grading plan and Site plan are two different entities. Each plan requires its own activity number. The plans can be submitted separately or together and bearing the pertinent information. The plans however way you decide to submit them, will require two sets for each activity number. 4. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 6. Please provide Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 7. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 8. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The Dumpster location is satisfactory with DSD, however permission must be obtained form Solid Waste. Contact John Clark @ 791-3175. 9. Please provide more spot elevations for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. 10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 11. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 12. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 13. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 14. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Drainage Statement: 1. A Drainage Statement is required for parcels which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 02/05/2004 | David Rivera | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/05/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSC TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM00126 Thompson Apartments 3943 E. Monte Vista Drive Site Plan Transmittal date: 1st Review February 6, 2004 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Stairs are allowed to encroach into the building setback a maximum of two (2) feet. The stairs cases as shown on the plan along the east and west sides of the building encroach into the interior building setback beyond the allowed maximum. A lot development option review and approval is required or the building must be redesigned to comply. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 2. There has been some discussion as to the proposed location of the dumpster. Patricia Gehlen will be holding a meeting with Engineering, Traffic and Solid Waste personnel to discuss other sites, which have been designed with the same dumpster location concept. At this time the dumpster location is still in question and may not be allowed to be placed on the site as shown. Further information will be forthcoming on this issue. Please call Patricia Gehlen for more information. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 3. Prior approvals, such as Development Review Board, Lot Development Option, Board of Adjustment, Historic District Advisory Board, and Historical Commission. List the LDO case number, date of approval and conditions of approval if any. A copy of the LDO approval letter must accompany the subsequent site plan submittal. Final approval of the site plan cannot be made the Zoning review Section until the LDO has been approved. DS 2-02.2.1.A.38 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents. |
| 02/09/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Although the aerial photo submitted meets the minimum scale requirement, the plan is required to show grading limits, existing topographic contours, and clear identification of trees to be preserved in place. In order to accomplish the requirements listed above the photo requires enlargement. 2) See landscape comment regarding the preservation requirements. 3) Any trees proposed as preserved-in-place are required to retain their existing character and the root zone of the trees is to remain undisturbed. Only minimal pruning will be allowed. |
| 02/09/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Refuse containers are to be placed so that the collection vehicle does not have to back into moving traffic, on or off the premises. DS 6-01.4.1.I 2) Submit a copy of the revised NPP plan. |
| 02/24/2004 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Site approval based on residential fire sprinklers provided for all units in lieu of fire apparatus access roadway. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/11/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | REJECT SHELF | Completed |