Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Permit Number - T04CM00125
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/09/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2004 | David Witt | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T04CM00125 3/11/04 2019 E. 9th STREET PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE. 2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. SITE PLAN: 1. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METER AND WATER SERVICE LINE. FOUNDATION PLANS: 1. NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE FOOTINGS, OR STATE THAT THE ASSUMED VALUE OF 1500 PSF IS BEING USED, PER TABLE R401.4.1, A SOILS REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED. IT IS UP TO THE DESIGNER/HOMEBUILDER TO BE AWARE OF THE SOIL AND CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. IF SOIL TESTING HAS BEEN DONE, A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND THE FOUNDATION DESIGN SHALL REFLECT THE SOILS REPORTS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING FOUNDATION BEARING ELEMENTS. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. SPECIFY DESIGN CRITERIA ON PLANS. VALUES FOR FLOOR DEAD LOAD AND LIVE LOAD, ROOF DEAD LOAD AND LIVE LOAD. 2. PROVIDE COMPLETE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SPECIFY AND SHOW SPAN OF ALL LINTELS AND HEADERS. PLEASE NOTE WEATHER OR NOT THE OPENINGS IN THE EXISTING MASONRY ARE TO BE EXISTING OPENINGS WITH EXISTING LINTELS. 3. SPECIFY LUMBER GRADE AND SPECIES. ELEVATIONS: 1. NOTE ALL ROOF DRAINS OR SCUPPERS ON FLAT-ROOFED AREAS PER R903.4. PLEASE USE SIZES AS REFLECTED IN APPENDIX D OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. 2. NOTE GLASS IN HAZARDOUS AREAS SHALL BE SAFETY GLASS PER R308.4. 3. WEST ELEVATION ; PLEASE NOTE THE CENTER OF THE ELECTRIC METER BASE IS REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN 6'-3" AND 3'-6" ABOVE GRADE. SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. 3 / A1.1 ; PROVIDE A NAILER FOR THE ½" G.W.B. 2. 5 / A1.1 ; DESCRIBE THE TYPE OF ANCHOR BOLT. 3. 5 / A1.1 ; THE "STUCCO SCREED" IS TO BE THE WEEP-TYPE. PLEASE DESCRIBE IT AS A "WEEP SCREED". 4. 5 / A1.1 ; PLEASE DESCRIBE THE BOTTOM PLATE. SEE R323.1 . 5. 8 / A1.1 ; THE HAND GRIP PORTION OF THE HAND RAIL IS REQUIRED TO BE BETWEEN 1 ¼" AND 2 5/8" IN DIAMETER OR EQUIVALENT. SEE R315.2 . 6. 8 / A1.1 ; PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE STOOP'S FLOOR ABOVE THE ADJACENT GRADE. SEE R316. 7. 7 / A1.1 ; DESCRIBE THE BLOCKING AND SPACEING OF THE BLOCKING. 8. 5 / A2.1 ; PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE SCUPPER. 9. 5, 6, 7 /A2.1 ; PROVIDE FIREBLOCKING AT THE CEILING LINE. 10. 6 / A2.1 ; DESCRIBE THE LEDGER TO STUD CONNECTION. 11. 6 / A2.1 ; DESCRIBE THE JOIST HANGER. 12. 3 /A3.1 ; PROVIDE THE ELEVATION OF THE STOOP'S FLOOR IN RELATION TO THE ADJACENT GRADE. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. PROVIDE PLUMBING FOR THE WASHER/DRYER. IS IT EXISTING IN THAT LOCATION? 2. JUSTIFY THE EXISTING GAS AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS' ABILITY TO CARRY THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOADS. 3. NOTE ON PLAN COMPLIANCE WITH WATER CONSERVATION; SINKS - 3 GALLONS, MAX., PER MINUTE. 4. PROVIDE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE RELIEF VALVE AT WATER HEATER. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. NOTE ON PLANS: ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 33 - 42, 2000 IRC. 2. PROVIDE A RECEPTACLE AT THE TOP NORTH OF THE REFRIGERATOR. IS THAT A TOP OR CABINET? 3. PROVIDE RECEPTACLES FOR THE EAST KITCHEN WALL IN ACCORD WITH R3801.2 . 4. ALL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS AT KITCHEN TOPS SHALL HAVE GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTING PROTECTION. NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS AT EACH OUTLET REQUIRING SUCH PROTECTION, PER E3802. 5. PLEASE NOTE THAT SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED FOR EXISTING SLEEPING AREAS. SEE R317.1.1 . MODEL ENERGY CODE: 1. PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER THE 1998 IECC, OR COMPLY WITH IRC CHAPTER 11. 2. CALL OUT ON THE PLANS THE "R" VALUES OF INSULATION, AS WELL AS THE "U" VALUES OF THE WINDOWS AND DOORS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS PROVIDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110 NOTE: AS OF 2-02-01 THE CITY OF TUCSON HAS ADOPTED THE 2000 IRC EXCEPT FOR THE PLUMBING PORTION WHICH IS THE STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL MODEL PLANS SHALL BE REFERENCE TO THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED CODES. ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK COMMENTS I'VE INCLUDED A SHORT FORM TO HELP WITH THE MODEL ENERGY CODE. IT SEEMS TO BE AN EASIER WAY TO USE THE CODE. THX., DAVE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/15/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |