Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T04CM00079
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/30/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. To comply with A.R.S. R4-30-304, if a professional document is revised by the originating registrant after the date the seal is signed, that registrant may indicate the date, nature and scope of the revisions, or, re-seal, re-sign, and re-date, with the current date. Seal and date on drawings still indicate December 2003. Review comments were made in January 2004. There are numerous annotations and clouds on the drawings but no revision numbers and no revision triangles. Please correct. 2. Provide original drawings with the next submittal. This comment was made in bold in underlined in all caps with the first set of review comments. 3. Circuit 28, counted at 1000 VA, is too low. Per NEC 220-3 (b) (9), each such outlet shall be computed at no less than 180 VA per receptacle. (7) (180) = 1260. Bear in mind that this is a minimum, and that if any kitchen equipment is to be powered from any new receptacles on this project, such receptacles may have more than 180 VA. This applies not only to the new equipment, but also to the load calculations for the existing. 5. 'Include an additional 25% for continuous load for all lighting circuits, and for any other load which is anticipated to run for three hours or more, and 25% of the largest motor. This applies to all load calculations for feeders and the service. See NEC 210-19 (a), 215-2 (a), 230-42 (a) (1), 430-22 (a), and 430-24." This comment was made on the previous submittal. Please note that 3 VA per square foot is not applicable to restaurant General Lighting loads per Table 230-3 (a). Please make corrections to load calculations on the panel schedule calculations, because loads are better documented there and more easily examined. 6. Regarding Note 3, per the 1998 IECC, no light source may be installed on the exterior of buildings unless it has a source efficacy of at least 45 lumens per watt. Incandescent has only 10-20 lumens per watt. Another note referencing incandescent now appears on Sheet 10. Please correct. 7. Specify conduit conductor sizes for branch circuits. |
| 05/06/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | building plans may not be approved by Zoning Review Section until structural review has been approved and the site plan has been approved by all sections. |
| 05/11/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations that show the project complies with the 1998 International Energy Conservation Code for commercial buildings. (Note: please resolve the differences between the U-factors and R-values shown on sheets 6, 8, and 10.) Reference Section 101.2, International Energy Conservation Code 1998. 2. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation for the CURRENT project. Use the factors shown in Table 403.3, IMC 2000. Reference Section 403, IMC 2000. 3. Comment not addressed. Show locations of all exhaust terminations and plumbing vents; revise plans as required to provide a separation of at least ten feet between air intake openings and exhaust openings. Reference 401.5, IMC. 4. Comment not addressed. Resolve the discrepancy between the amount of air delivered to the addition by the ductwork (1200 CFM) and the amount of air delivered to the addition by HP-1 (4000 CFM). Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000. |
| 05/12/2004 | Robert Sherry | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide complete the calculations showing that the water supply piping is sized in accordance with Section 610.4, UPC 1994. Include ALL existing fixtures (including hose bibbs) in calculations. Show reduced pressure backflow preventer size. Show the data referenced in Section 610.7, UPC 1994. Use either Section 610.12 or 610.13 to size the hot water piping. Revise the pipe sizes as required. Reference Section 610.0, UPC 1994. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide invert elevations for the existing building sewer where it crosses the foundation. Reference Section 313.0, UPC 1994. 3. Comment not addressed. Clarify the actual route of the existing building sewer - is it as shown on sheets 1,2, and 3, or on sheet 9? Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 4. Coordinate the waste isometric with the plumbing plan. Show the existing cleanouts on the plans. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 5. Comment not addressed. Show how the existing grade cleanouts are to be modified to be located inside the addition. Show the location of the cleanouts on the plumbing plan. Reference Sections 103.2.3, 707.4, and 719.0, UPC 1994. 6. Comment not addressed. Provide rim elevation of upstream sewer manhole and floor elevation of addition. Reference Section 710.1, UPC 1994. 7. Include sizing information on roof drainage plans; provide overflow drains for the roof. Reference Appendix D, UPC 1994. |
| 05/13/2004 | Raul Palma | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/02/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building plans may not be approved prior to site plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/04/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |