Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU03059
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/12/2005 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Shiela M. Bowen P.E. DATE: January 13, 2005 Castro Engineering, Corp. 3580 W. Ina Road, Ste. 200 Tucson, Arizona 85741 SUBJECT: La Estancia de Tucson Stockpile plan Grading/Stockpile Plan T04BU03059 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None. Grading Plan: 1. The Grading/Stockpile plan has been conditionally approved by Engineering. 2. No other grading shall take place other then the grading necessary for the streets prior to or in conjunction with the completion/construction of the Julian Wash re-alignment. The grading restrictions include but are not limited to the mass grading and/or grubbing of the individual blocks, common areas and ret/det basins of La Estancia De Tucson subdivision. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: 1. The SWPPP plan is approved by Engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/La Estancia de Tucson Stockpile Grading |
01/18/2005 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Development of the area included on the plans requires approval from CDRC. Submit Development/Landscape NPP plans to CDRC. Once approved these plans are to be included with the grading plans for reference. 2. Per LUC 3.8.4.5 the native plant preservation "plan shall affirm, by a statement on the Plan, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law". Revise as necessary. 3. The salvage and mitigation analysis on sheet N1 indicates that Pima Pineapple cacti may exist on the site and that they have been included in the inventory. Revise the inventory to show any of these found on the site. One hundred (100) percent of Federal Endangered species shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site per LUC 3.8.6.2.A. 4. Provide a landscape plan to show the ultimate disposition of PIP, TOS, and required mitigation as shown in NPP summary per DS 2-15.3.4.B.2 5. Sheet N-1 indicates the location of a temporary off site nursery. Include area in NPP calculations or reference a previously approved NPP plan per DS 2-15.3.4.A.5 6. Include method for irrigation to salvaged plants in the temporary holding area DS 2-15.3.4.B.4 |
01/25/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 01/25/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan for the stock pile has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Landscape Review Section. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
01/26/2005 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
01/26/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |