Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU03017
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Steve Gregor, P.E. DATE: January 12, 2005 Gregor and Grenier 5232 E. Pima Street, Ste. A Tucson, Arizona 85712 SUBJECT: Retail Center Valencia/Nexus, Lot 3, McDonalds Restaurant T04BU03017 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 22 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) and SWPPP cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Submit the approved stamped Development plan with the re-submittal. 3. For future reference, (3) copies of the Grading plan are required for submittal. · A copy of the GP for COT Records. · A copy of the GP for the client. · A copy of the GP to be attached to the SWPPP for the inspectors use. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9130 E. Valencia Road Grad |
| 01/25/2005 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 01/25/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan or development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site/development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
| 12/21/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved development plan including landscape and approved revision plans to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/26/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/26/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |