Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU02978
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2005 | Elizabeth Eberbach | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Carl Ewing RA SUBJECT: Montage Vista II Lot 58 Grading Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach DATE: January 10, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04BU02978 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Grading Plan submittal and permit application for lot 58 and does not recommend approval of this grading plan at this time. Address the following comments: GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Development Standards (DS) Section 11-01.4.1.C.3: On sheet G-1, provide grading limit delineation around the area of proposed disturbance; disturbance is limited to proposed amenities and construction area. Remove "Grading Limit" text adjacent to preservation fence, or clarify as the maximum grading limit not used for this project. See redlines. 2) DS Sec.11-01.9.3.B: Provide slope setback at north boundary for construction area of retaining wall footer as well as temporary stormwater runoff controls to prevent disturbance of adjacent lot. Dimension distance to grading limits to clarify construction area for footer and dimension to footer as well as to wall from property line. See redlines. 3) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: On sheet G-1, locate cross section detail 3 adjacent to the most restrictive section adjacent to proposed building, and clarify the following for detail 3 on sheet G-2 (see redlines): a) Show utility unit and edge of building; b) Show and label minimum dimension from edge of building to center flowline of swale; c) Label dimensions for slope and interceptor swale; d) Show and label grading limits and Property line; 4) DS Sec.3-01.2.1.A: Show general locations of proposed utility lines from pedestals to house. 5) DS Sec.11-01.9.2: On sheet G-1, provide interceptor swale and location of grade break for flows on the top of the cut slope near the south boundary. See redlines. 6) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Clarify the following: a) Clarify cross section detail A-A on sheet G-2; show grading limit. b) On sheet G-1, provide maximum dimension for the extent of cut/fill for rear yard; see redlines. c) On sheet G-1, clarify keynote numbers 1-3 as being on a separate sheet. 7) DS Sec.9-04.3.1.B.5: Provide the Geotechnical Report that addresses the proposed exposed cut slope at the south boundary and any other recommendations. For resubmittal, provide 3 copies of the revised grading plans, a copy of the geotechnical report, redlines, a response letter addressing all comments, and any other supplemental documents. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services |
| 01/24/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | Engineering approval and a viable site plan are required for zoing review. |
| 12/17/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/24/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/24/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |