Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU02749
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Dan White DATE: November 30, 2004 PRE Inc. 4655 N. Flowing Wells Rd. Tucson, Arizona 85705 SUBJECT: 8325 E. Golf Links Rd. Grading Plan T04BU02749 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 21 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting" 3. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the GP. 4. List administrative address/site address on plans. 5. List subdivision or Development number. 6. Show cross section with transverse and longitudinal slopes. 7. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed. 8. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 9. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabbions or vegetation). 10. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 11. Dimension basin and provide spot elevations. 12. Show Peak discharge at basin's outlet. 13. A permit will be necessary for any work performed within the public drainage way of the Pantano Wash or the Atturbury Wash. Contact Yash Desai at Transportation at (520) 791-5100 for pertinent information. Also contact Suzanne Shields at the Pima County flood control district, 740-6350, for county requirements. 14. A flood plain use permit is required for any work done in any FEMA flood plains. A right-of-way permit will be required by Pima County. Drainage report: 1. The Drainage report has been accepted by engineering. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: Site Map 1. Show, on the site map, locations where stabilization practices are expected to occur. Show stabilization for retention basin (Part IV.C.3.d) Structural Practices 1. Show on the site map where possible concrete wash-out locations may be permitted, as the construction is be completed, the wash-out area may need to be moved. Signature Requirements 2. Include a certification and signature for each operator in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1) 3. All NOIs must be signed and certified as follows: a) For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Part, a responsible corporate officer means: i) A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation; or ii) The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. b) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: By a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; orFor a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency is the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g. Regional Administrators of EPA.). Permit Related Records 4. Include a copy of the general permit and the NOI that was or will be submitted to ADEQ. If other agreements with any state, local, or federal agencies exist that would affect the provisions or implementation of the SWPPP, include copies of those agreements. (Part IV.F) The NOI Related Rezoning case C9-89-39: Be advised that changes to the rezoning conditions on the adjacent property might result in changes to the drainage design since it depends on the drainage design on the other property. The following comments are a draft until the Zoning Examiner prepares the final report to Mayor & Council. 1. Preparation of a complete Drainage Report, including details of detention/retention, is required. 2. Each detention/retention basin shall include a sediment trap, or other sediment control measures as approved by the City Engineer, to prevent sedimentation of the detention/retention basin. Each sediment trap, or other sediment control measure, shall have a provision for total drainage. 3. Detention/retention basin floors shall be graded to drain either toward the outlet structure or other logical point. Basin floors shall not be flat. 4. Detention/retention basins in or adjacent to the residential area shall be located adjacent to a street or accessible common area. The location shown on the preliminary development plan dated November 1, 2004 does not satisfy this condition. The location must be revised to be adjacent to the proposed onsite roadway. Basin sideslopes shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Detention/Retention Manual for human activity zones. 5. Rectangular basin shapes shall be avoided unless necessitated by recreational or visual amenities within the basin. 6. Vegetation shall be used as screening and/or security barrier for a minimum of ten percent of the basin perimeter. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax, C:/8325 E. Golf Links Rd. grad |
| 12/01/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Plans shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that they will conform to the provisions of this code and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations per DS 11-01.4.1.C. Clearly indicate on the grading plan the limits of disturbance. 2. Add note to grading plan or cross reference Wash Vegetation Analysis pertaining to: All plants designated to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A 3. Note: Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140. |
| 12/17/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 12/17/04 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will review the revised grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development plan. 3. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan, may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/23/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |