Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T04BU02640
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/13/2005 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 01/13/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped tentative plat and landscape plans. |
| 12/16/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Plans shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that they will conform to the provisions of this code and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations per DS 11-01.4.1.C. Clearly indicate on grading plan the limits of disturbance and natural areas identical to approved NPP and landscape plans. 2. Add note to grading plan or cross reference NPP plan pertaining to: All plants designated to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A 3. Note: Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140. |
| 12/17/2004 | Laith Alshami | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Floodplain and Engineering comments, 01/10/2005. 1- Revise on the Paving Plan the Paving Notes numbers. There are two Paving Notes that are numbered "2". 2- Show the contour line elevations for C.A. "C" west of lot 131. 3- Provide the proposed spot elevations at the all corners of all lots. 4- It appears that lots187-189 do not meet the differential grading requirements. Show the zoning of the parcel (i.e. commercial or residential zoning) east of the impacted lots to determine if the lots must comply with the differential grading requirement. Refer to Development Standard 11-01.8.0 for additional information concerning differential grading. 5- It is not clear how the new fill, which will raise lots 152-156 and 165 will be installed without encroaching on the proposed channel and the private property to the west (i.e. retaining wall, protected slope, etc.). Provide construction details for the proposed method soil retention. 6- Verify that proposed slopes that are steeper than 5:1 are treated according to the Soils Report recommendations. 7- The Soils Report should address the required setbacks from the proposed detention basins. 8- Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. SWPPP Comments: The SWPPP is acceptable, however it can not be approved until the Grading Plan is approved. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2005 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/19/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |