Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU02406
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 13, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU02406 PROJECT NAME: Presidio Park Central PROJECT ADDRESS: 3226 East Presidio Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. 1. A copy of the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit must accompany the SWPPP. Include a copy of the general permit with the SWPPP. 2. Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. The operator responsible for day to day activities (the contractor) and the operator with control over plans and specifications (owner/engineer) is required to submit an NOI to the state and a copy to the City of Tucson. Submit two NOIs filled out and signed by the appropriate parties. (Part IV.F) |
| 10/13/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved tentative plat including landscape plan to continue review. |
| 10/13/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 13, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU02406 PROJECT NAME: Presidio Park Central PROJECT ADDRESS: 3226 E. Presidio Rd. PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E., CFM The following items must be revised or added to the Grading Plan. Please include a letter with the next submittal addressing how all the engineering and floodplain comments have been addressed. Resubmittal Required: Grading Plan Grading Plan 1. A copy of the stamped approved Tentative Plat must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Tentative Plat shows the location and size of the wall openings on the east property boundary. The Grading Plan must also show, label and dimension all drainage structures. 3. The Tentative Plat shows a 3' X 6' concrete apron at the inlet to the basins. The Grading Plan must also show, label and dimension all drainage structures. 4. Sheet 3 shows numerous keynotes that are not identified on any of the grading sheets. Detail A shows keynotes 5, 25, 26, 36. Detail D shows a keynote 45. Detail F shows a keynote 5. Check that all keynotes are properly identified. |
| 11/01/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | November 1, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Two copies of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with grading plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submitttal for compliance and consistency with the approved tentative plat and landscape plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/02/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |