Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU02324
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved tentative plat, landscape, NPP, and ERZ plans to continue review. |
| 10/14/2004 | Laith Alshami | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, 10/14/2004, Grading Plan Comments for Sycamore Park Village 7: 1- Include the site administrative address. 2- Include the Grading Plan case number on the first sheet of the Grading Plan. This comment applies to all Villages Grading Plans. 3- Provide all Parcel dimensions and bearings. Show how the parcel ties into the basis of bearing. 3- Add a General Note for Blue Staking the project before any excavation work. 4- Revise Grading Note #8 to reference Development Standard 11-01.0 (Excavation and Grading) instead of Chapter 36 of the IBC. 5- It appears that Old Oak Drive cross section is different from what is shown on the Tentative Plat (i.e. changed from a crown section to a warp section). Address this change and the impact of moving the runoff to one side of the street. 6- Do all Type "B" lots have drainage openings in their back yards walls to allow lot runoff discharge? This comment applies to all Villages Grading Plans. 7- Depict the high and low points on the proposed streets. This comment applies to all villages grading plans. 8- Call out the proposed detention basin number, its dimensions, and depth, to facilitate its construction and inspection. Please be advised that all proposed detention basins in all the villages must be graded to provide positive drainage and prevent nuisance ponding. 9- Provide some measures to prevent inadvertent vehicular access through the proposed detention basins access ramps (i.e. removable bollards, gates, etc.). This comment applies to all Villages Grading Plans. 10- Provide some measures to prevent inadvertent vehicular access through all proposed Common Areas that have access to proposed streets (i.e. Common Area "A" between lots 26 and 27, etc.). This comment applies to all Villages Grading Plans. 11- Please be advised that a Right of Way Permit or a Private Improvement Agreement will be needed for any work performed within existing or proposed right of way. Contact Permits and Code at (520) 791-5100 for additional information. This comment applies to all Sycamore Park Villages. 12- Due to the proximity of the proposed grading activities to the North Fork Airport Wash (ERZ Wash), delineate and call out the grading limits near the wash floodplain limits and propose on the plan a method by which the grading activities do not encroach on the floodplain. 13- Verify if the dedication and recordation information shown on Pantano Road and Common Area between lots 26 and 27, on sheet 6 0f 7 is needed on the Grading Plan. 14- Provide all lot dimensions. 15- Show a typical cross section across the lot line of two lots to demonstrate the slope between the grade-separated lots. 16- Show the water harvesting area and how you propose to convey onsite runoff to the proposed basins. Compliance can be demonstrated by a note. 17- Lot elevations have changed from the Tentative Plat. Explain the need for the proposed change. 18- Label all streets as public or private. 19- Submit a revised soils report that addresses slope protection, drainage and required setbacks from the proposed detention basins. 20- Resubmit the redlined plan with future Grading Plan submittals. 21- Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. Landscape Plan: 1- Show the sight visibility triangles to ensure that the proposed landscaping will not obstruct visibility. 2- Show locations of water harvesting if applicable. SWPPP Comments: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) does not meet the requirements of the ADEQ Construction General Permit. The following comments must be addressed: 1. It appears that the construction of Sycamore Park Boulevard is not included in this SWPPP. Since the road construction is a part of this development, it must also be covered by a SWPPP. 2. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 3. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 4. Part IV.C.2.e. Revise the general location map to show a 1-mile radius around site. 5. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. 6. Part IV.C.3.a. Identify on the site map drainage patterns and estimated slopes after grading. Include lot and street drainage patterns. 7. Part IV.C.3.g. Identify on the map locations where stormwater is discharged to a surface water (e.g. ephemeral waters or dry washes). 8. The Contractor's Report must be completed before any work begins on the site. 9. Revise the NOI and NOT instructions to indicate that each operator must submit an NOI and an NOT to City of Tucson Development Services Engineering Division on the First Floor. 10. In the response letter, indicate the location in the plan where revisions have been made to address these comments. |
| 10/22/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | October 22, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. In addition to the approvedand stamped tentative plat copies, two copies of the approved and stamped landscape and NPPO plans must be included with grading plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plans on the next submittal. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |