Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T04BU02306
Parcel: 141030280

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T04BU02306
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/28/2005 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied Approved site plan required prior to grading plan approval.
09/29/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. Plans shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that they will conform to the provisions of this code and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations per DS 11-01.4.1.C. Clearly indicate on NPP, landscape, site and grading plans the limits of disturbance for 10' landscape buffer area remove reference on grading plan pertaining to 30" berm and landscape.
10/24/2005 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 26, 2005
TO: Paul Nzomo, Coronado Engineering
SUBJECT: Landscape Material Facility, Site Plan and Grading Plan Review
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM04208 and T04BU02306

SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Site Plan, Grading Plan and Drainge Report (DR) were not approved at this time.

Drainage Report Comments

1. In previous comments you were asked to revise the retention volume calculation to use the 5-year run-off coefficients. Please include the data used for the retention volume calculations in the Drainage Report. Revise the site and grading plans to provide adequate retention volumes, if necessary.
2. As previously commented, demonstrate that the bleed pipe will be designed so the retention requirements will be met. Provide hydraulic calculations showing that the bleed pipes will discharge less than 1 cfs per Section 2.2 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual.
3. As previously commented, present the calculations used to delineate the floodplain limits. Provide an exhibit showing the location of the cross-sections used for floodplain delineation purposes. (DS) 10-02.2.3.1.4.E)
4. As previously commented, revise the site plan in the drainage report to include all of the required elements from DS 10-02.2.3.1.6. This shall include the following: location, size and type of inflow and outflow structures, with dimensions and elevations; location and size of maintenance access ramps and roadways; and maximum water-surface elevations and the limits of ponding. Any other applicable requirements must also be included.
5. Determine and delineate on each site plan the erosion hazard setback for each of the drainageways.

Site Plan and Grading Plan Comments.

Since this is the fourth submittal, a per hour review fee will be charged for this review and for all subsequent reviews.
6. Clearly show and label the flood-prone areas on the site plan. Show water surface contours at least every 200 feet.
7. The basin routing pages in the drainage report appear to indicate that the basins will have outlet weirs. Provide details, dimensions and elevations for each weir.
8. Provide recordation information or other evidence demonstrating that this project has permission to perform the paving improvements required along the driveway. At the least provide a letter from the pipeline operator indicating that the pipeline is buried deeply enough to handle the heavy trucks that will be accessing this facility. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.11)

SWPPP Comments
9. Revise the inspection schedule in the SWPPP so that the reduced schedule includes an inspection whenever rain is predicted in accordance with Part IV.H.2 of the general permit.
Revise the Site Plan, Grading Plan and the Drainage Report to address all of these comments and resubmit four copies of the site/grading plan and SWPPP and two copies of the Drainage Report. I

Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/28/2005 JMORALE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/28/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed