Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU02194
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 09/22/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Approved site plan required. |
| 10/05/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 5, 2004 TO: Acorn and Associates SUBJECT: DM Credit Union, Site Plan and Grading Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM04029 and T04BU02194 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Site Plan, Grading Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) were not approved at this time. The Drainage report is approved for purposes of this site and grading plan only. Include a copy of the drainage report with future submittals. Site and Grading Plan comments: 1. Revise the site and grading plans to conform with the requirements of the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson, Arizona (TAMG). The TAMG require a minimum separation of 80 feet between adjacent driveways and a maximum of two driveways within three hundred feet of frontage. Show driveways on adjacent properties to demonstrate that this standard is being met. (TAMG 5.5) 2. The drainage report indicates that the high point of the driveways will be above the 100-year water surface elevation. Revise the grades at the driveway to comply with the drainage report. 3. Identify, in the legend, the symbol that is used along the right of way. 4. Revise general note 3 on sheet C3 to direct the contractor to T-DOT Permits and Codes section for Right-of-Way permits. 5. Show the sight visibility triangles for existing driveways. 6. All of the type should be 12 point or greater so it can be read after microfilming. 7. Indicate that the proposed solid waste enclosure will be used for the occupants of the existing and proposed buildings or provide an accessible enclosure for the occupants of the existing buildings. 8. Revise the solid waste enclosures to provide concrete filled pipe bollards along the sides in addition to the rear of the enclosure. The distance between the bollards must be at least 10 feet. SWPPP comments: 9. Update the SWPPP to match changes in the site and grading plans. 10. Part IV.J.1. Each Operator must sign the SWPPP Revise the Site Plan, Grading Plan and the SWPPP to address all of these comments and resubmit three copies of the grading plan and the SWPPP. Include a copy of the drainage report. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/13/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |