Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Stopped
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU02066
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Stopped
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include correct legal description including subdivision and lot number per DS 2-02.2.1.2 2. According to approved tentative and final plat Case #98-065 lot #12 allowable grading limits and undisturbed natural area do not coincide with the Site/Grading/HDZ plan submittal. Extent of allowable grading is 6,691 sq. ft. Under no circumstances shall development occur within Undisturbed Natural Area B as shown on City of Tucson Subdivision Map & Plats: Book 53 @ Page 6 per LUC 3.8.6.4. 3. Boundaries of all set aside areas shall be clearly delineated on site plan, and fenced per Development Standard 2-06.2.2.F for the duration of any construction activities. (Ord. No. 9246, §1, 10/11/99) 4. Note on site plan: · All disturbed areas including utility trenches or septic leaching fields, which are not located in parking or driveway areas, will be revegetated in compliance with DS 9-04.3.2 · Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed plants and natural desert areas per DS 2-6.0 Figure-1 · Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140. |
| 09/07/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: 240 S. Corte Tortuga Vista REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 7 September 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T04CM03829/T04BU02066 T14S, R13E, Section 17 Resubmittal Required: Revised Site/Grading/HDZ Plan, copies of the approved Tentative and Final Plats. SUMMARY: A thorough and proper review could not be performed with the material submitted, and Engineering Division approval is not recommended at this time. The plan submitted does not demonstrate compliance with development requirements indicated on the approved Tentative and Final Plats, and associated exhibits. Resubmittal shall include copies of the stamped/approved Tentative and Final Plats and a revised SITE/GRADING/HDZ PLAN demonstrating conformance to all applicable plat requirements for this subdivision. The comments listed below must be addressed prior to resubmittal. Additionally, address any redlines on the plans that are not listed below in comment format, on a revised SITE/GRADING/HDZ PLAN. 1. Provide a soils report with geotechnical recommendations for this site development. The report should address specific drainage, setbacks, terracing, and interceptor swale recommendations/requirements, in addition to typical soils report contents. 2. Clearly depict and label all grading limits on the plan. 3. Provide a note that site grading shall be in conformance with the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) - local amendment (Chapter 36 - Excavation and Grading). For further information, visit http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/2000_IBC_Amendments.pdf 4. Depict and label all easements and utility locations. 5. Revise General Notes #'s 1, 2, 3, 6 & 7. 6. Provide a contour interval. 7. The revised plan must demonstrate conformance to all Hillside Development grading, revegetation and stabilization requirements outlined in Development Standard 9-04.3.1- 9-04.3.3. Subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. The comments provided above do not represent a thorough review. Additional information must be provided as noted in the summary, prior to provision of a complete Site/Grading/HDZ plan review. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 09/11/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | September 11, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Approved and stamped site plan required prior to Zoning approval of the grading plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Stop |
| 08/19/2004 | ANY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Stopped |