Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T04BU01950
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2011 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Silverbell Vista Final Revision / As-built Grading Plan 3rd Resubmittal Review TO: Urban Engineering (Bill Cowie, PE) REVIEWER: E Leibold, PE ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01950 LOCATION: T13S, R13E, Section 33 SUMMARY: The revised Silverbell Vista subdivision project closure documents were resubmitted for review. An annual subdivision drainage certification report was submitted to the City of Tucson 2NOV10; a final inspection is required prior to final approval and additional punchlist items may be required after comments are addressed. Final Inspection punchlist will be provided after the as-built plans are approved. A revised project closure package will be required to be submitted addressing the following comments. For further lot releases, project completion approvals, and assurance release, all of the comments must be addressed. A meeting with the consultant is required before resubmittal to go over remaining comments. PRIVATE STREET, GRADING PLAN AND DRAINAGE ADDENDA COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec. 11-01.16: Address the remaining clarifications on the as-built plans on planview or details and/or drainage addenda. It maybe necessary to meet to discuss how the remaining items have been completed. a) DS Sec.10-01.5.6: Regarding the weir at west drop catch basin area, further explain how further erosion is/will be prevented from occurring, as there were indications from previous storms that breakout erosion occurred at north and south ends of the concrete weir. b) Elevation profile along west property boundary at west inlet structures shall be verified for conveyance for anticipated 100-year floodplain condition. Provide calculation showing that the extents of the weir provide sufficient width including freeboard to receive the west wash 100-year event. Provide floodplain limits on the plans. Provide additional drainage discussion, and if necessary, proposed revised design to address prevention of potential erosion at either end of concrete weir. c) Elevation profile, along east property boundary at top of channel between end of concrete weir at box culvert, shall be verified for conveyance for anticipated 100-year floodplain condition. Provide redesign of recently placed fill at top of channel showing that the 100-yr flow over this area will be protected from erosion / scour along the extents of the outflow area of this drainage way. Provide additional drainage discussion, calculations, and proposed revised design to address prevention of potential erosion and scour at this outlet where 600 cfs of 100-yr flow exits the site. 2) Many items have been addressed per the comment letter, inspections, and Annual Report. As stated previously, outstanding construction items must be completed prior to final. A final grading inspection can not be done until an acceptable as-built is submitted for the inspection. Final Inspection punchlist will be provided after the as-builts are approved. Remaining items were noted from a recent partial inspection for this review of the submitted plans: a) Remove remaining trash and debris from north channel area, including exposed rebar near lot 18, and manhole ring and cover. b) Clean out debris from catch basin inlet near lot 35. c) Repair erosion adjacent to existing power pole, electrical & phone service cabinets at northeast corner of basin. d) Regarding Annual report, review and provide discussion in response letter to items 3f, 3h, and 5. 3) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.1.F: The response letter contains engineering information and certification that work has been completed; provide seal for response letter. 4) For resubmittal, provide 2 copies of the following documents: revised as-built grading plans, private street as-built improvement plans, elevation datum statement, revised drainage addenda, field reports, sealed response letter, and engineer of record letters (substantial completion & drainage completion). If you have any questions, you are welcome to call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
| 07/19/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | July 19, 2011 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T04BU01950 Grading Plans for S03-033 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/29/2011 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |