Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU01911
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved site plan to continue review. |
| 08/10/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 10, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01911 PROJECT NAME: Armored Car Canopy PROJECT ADDRESS: 231 W. Alturas PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E., CFM The following items must be revised or added to the Grading Plan. Please include a letter with the next submittal addressing how all the engineering and floodplain comments have been addressed. Resubmittal Required: Grading Plan Grading Plan 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. Show the basis of elevation for the plan. Site Plan standards require a elevations based on a COT bench mark. The TDOT website shows an elevation of 2366 NAVD-88 in the northeast corner of Lot 1. The ground appears to drop about two feet to the southwest corner of the lot. The submitted Grading Plan shows an existing basin in the middle of the lot (about 4 ft. deep). Aerial photos do not seem to show this hole. Acurate existing grades must be shown based on a COT monument. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23 3. Stormwater must be accepted and released from developments in approximately the same locations and with the same magnitude as found under existing conditions. If a basin currently exists at the site (as the contours on the submitted plan shows) then filling this hole may push stormwater on to the development to the south. Show accurate existing and proposed contours. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 12.5 and IBC Chapter 36 4. Show proposed drainage arrows on the plan. IBC Chapter 36 |
| 08/22/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section and approval of the site plan. 2. Two copies of the approved and stamped site plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with grading plan. 3. Please insure for consistency that the grading plan matches the site plan design and requirements. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/08/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |