Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T04BU01875
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2004 | Patricia Gilbert | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 15, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01875 PROJECT NAME: Navajo North PROJECT ADDRESS: 104 West Navajo Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Show the 100-year peak water surface elevation (WSEL) on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. The above comment was from the first submittal. The WSEL shown on the site and the grading plan is from the drainage report which uses the datum NGVD 1929. On sheet 1 of the site site/grading plan is shows the basis of elevation being used is NAVD 1988. All elevations must have the same datum. Revise as necessary. 4. The plan shows fill in excess of two feet. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. Until the discrepancy with the datum is resolved the applicability of this comment is pending. 5. Include in the general grading notes, comment number 11, "Chapter 36" of the 2000 International Building Code. The above comment was from the first submittal. It is acknowledged that it was addressed correctly. However since the time of the first review the language of "Chapter 36" of the 2000 International Building Code" has been changed to a development standard, DS 11-01. Please revise the note to show that all grading will conform to the Grading and Excavation Development Standard 11-01. |
| 11/24/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 12/15/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/21/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |