Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU01875
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the correct mitigation for Prosopis velutina according to preservation table. Revise preservation plan to coincide with plant preservation totals. Zizyphus obtusifolia is indicate in the totals per DS 2-15.0 |
| 08/19/2004 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 16th, 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04BU01875 PROJECT NAME: Navajo North PROJECT ADDRESS: 104 West Navajo Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. This project is subject to the requirements of the City of Tucson Code, Chapter 26. Floodplain and Erosion Hazard. A completed elevation certificate by a state-registered land surveyor is required to be returned to Development Services, Engineering Section prior to final inspection and a certificate of occupancy is issued. Please note that any mechanical equipment; water heaters, air conditioning systems, coolers, etc, must be elevated one foot above the water surface elevation and certified on the same elevation certificate for the structure. This project will have four elevation certificates given that the project has four structures. Chapter 26.5.2. 4. Show the 100-year peak water surface elevation (WSEL) on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. 5. Show roof drainage (flow arrows). DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 6. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-08.4.1.E 7. Show more finish grades on the plan. Drainage patterns must be readily definable in all areas. DS 2-08.4.1.E, DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 8. The plan shows fill in excess of two feet. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 9. Include in the general grading notes, comment number 11, "Chapter 36" of the 2000 International Building Code. 10. Perimeter wall must have adequate flow-through wall openings for accepting and releasing drainage without elevating or ponding water on the upstream side of the development and so as to not concentrate or increase flow on the downstream side. To meet this requirement show wall openings for the required perimeter wall on the site plan. Provide a detail on the plan of the wall openings, give dimensions. SMDDFM 12.5 11. Show the depth of the water harvesting areas (6") in the landscape border. Either by a general note or label on the plan. 12. Development in the floodway fringe shall be constructed so as to protect placed fill from erosion which could be caused by waters, or otherwise. Such fill shall be permitted only when demonstrated by the owner/developer that it will have some beneficial purpose, as determined by the city engineer, and the amount of proposed fill is not in excess of what is necessary to achieve that purpose. The fill shall be protected from erosion which could be accomplished by placing riprap, vegetative cover, bulk heading, or any other city engineer approved methods. Revise grading plan to show protective measures for the fill. Tucson Code Chapter 26-5.2.12 13. In areas where fill is to be used to raise the elevation of the building site, the building line shall be located not less than twenty-five (25) feet landward from any edge of the fill, unless a study prepared by a state-registered professional civil engineer and approved by the city engineer shows that a lesser distance is acceptable. Tucson Code Chapter 26-8.d.2 14. Drainage report specifies that existing and proposed drainage is north to south discharging on to Navajo Road. The proposed grading plan shows split drainage. It appears that half the property is proposed to discharge to the north or northwest. This is not acceptable. Stormwater must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under natural or existing conditions. |
| 08/22/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | August 22, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. Approval of the site, landscape and NPPO plans is required prior to final approval of teh grading plan. Please include with the next grading plan submittal packet two copies of the approved site, landscape and NPPO plan sheets. 2. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Section |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2004 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/08/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |